Talk:Richard Orjis

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Arts and Entertainment This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance). Visual arts This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles New Zealand Low‑importance Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dear Editor,

There has been an error with CorenSearchBot, as the material for 'Richard Orjis' was not taken from the website in question and bears little resemblance.

Thank you for your time,

Lisa Brown aka Antipodean Arts —Preceding unsigned comment added by Antipodeanarts (talk • contribs) 03:27, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lisa

First of all, welcome to Wikipedia.

I was the editor who removed the material that CorenSearchBot said was a possible copyright violation. I removed it because I looked up the website that CorenSearchBot said it found the text on, and whilst it wasn't word for word the exact same text, it did bear a striking resemblance. The resemblance was too alike for it to stay here on Wikipedia, and, as it wasn't eseential to the article itself, that's why I erased it.

Also, CorenSearchBot did not say that you took the text from that article, it was marked as a possible copyright violation. I hope this clears things up for you --5 albert square (talk) 00:14, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]