Talk:Right to sit

A fact from Right to sit appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 November 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that workers have the right to sit in some jurisdictions?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2021/November. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Right to sit.

Wikipedia

Feminism

	Feminism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Human rights

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

project's importance scale

.

Organized Labour High‑importance

	Organized Labour portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Retailing Bottom‑importance

Bottom

This article has been rated as Bottom-importance on the importance scale.

Retailing To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

SM Lanang Premier
Copyedit : Retailing in India
Expand : :- Please expand this project's list of articles. The subcategories of Category:Retailers

is also an excellent starting point.
- Expand this project's image gallery page

- More articles for expansion:
Suggested retail price
Other : * Please add this project's banner {{WikiProject Retailing
}} to retail-related talk pages. Also, bots can be utilized to automate this task.
Also, add biographies to the articles list.

–When a task is completed, please remove it from the list.

Women's History Mid‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 06:06, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that workers have the right to sit in some jurisdictions?

Reviewed: Joe Youssefi

Created by Bohemian Baltimore (talk). Nominated by SL93 (talk) at 00:28, 28 October 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Right to sit...now this is gonna be an interesting one. Reviewing right now. Heythereimaguy (talk) 00:14, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, this article is new enough, long enough, cited well, and no copyvio detected (2.9% similarity). The hook is short enough, interesting enough, and "cited" in the article (it's the entire article). Finally, QPQ done. Nice job, non-digital source and non-English source accepted in good faith. Heythereimaguy (talk) 00:20, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To

T:DYK/P3