Talk:Roads and Transit

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: Washington / Seattle Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Washington - Seattle (assessed as Low-importance).

I deleted the last sentence in this article for two reasons. Firstly, the Sierra Club's reason for opposing Roads and Transit is not because of the tax, it's because of the concerns involving global warming. Secondly, there's no source or evidence of the nonsense about the "largest tax increase in WA State history or America". The entire thing was bias and unfounded. 67.160.106.255 10:10, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The ballot measure described in this entry failed at the polls. It wouldn't seem to have any lasting historical relevance. It should be removed from Wikipedia. 209.166.92.114 (talk) 00:40, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This has lasting historical relevance because "Roads and Transit" failed, but "Transit only" succeeded the next year, which was an important sign of the political situation. Merge with "Sound Transit" article?

24.59.161.166 (talk) 02:57, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]