Talk:Roland TR-808

	Roland TR-808 is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
	This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on October 17, 2017.
Article milestones Date Process Result January 20, 2017 Good article nominee Listed September 21, 2017 Featured article candidate Promoted
Current status: Featured article

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Roland TR-808 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Musical Instruments Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Musical Instruments, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of musical instruments on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Musical InstrumentsWikipedia:WikiProject Musical InstrumentsTemplate:WikiProject Musical Instrumentsmusical instruments articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

project's importance scale .

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: https://www.muzines.co.uk/articles/roland-beatboxes/4709

The names of some of the additional engineers and their specific roles has surfaced and been documented in two places, so it would be great to incorporate these details. https://rc-808.com/about-us/ https://www.smithsonianmag.com/arts-culture/history-tr-808-drum-machine-180975205 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nsputnik (talk • contribs) 02:24, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Although it's hard to source - the only solid information comes from blogs, e.g. - the defective transistor was apparently a 2SC828-R noise generator. It seems that Roland did manage to source replacements (presumably they expected to sell more than 12,000 808s) but it required hand-selecting, which would have been costly. This might explain why different 808 units on Youtube sound subtly different. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 15:16, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This note inspired me to update the article to clarify that the faulty transistors were deliberately chosen and not an accident. Orange Suede Sofa (talk) 22:22, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Stratocaster is famous for being an ingenious piece of industrial design by Leo Fender and his colleagues, and is the most commercially successful mass produced electric guitar form. The Strat has been cloned, copied and modified to the point where its double cutaway body shape is the basis for many contemporary electric guitar and bass designs. This is absolutely indisputable.

However, the Stratocaster as a sonic musical tool, and not a piece of visual iconography, is not nearly as influential to the sound of Rock music as the TR-808 has been to the sound of Hip Hop and all other forms of electronic music!

When listening to Rock music performed with a Stratocaster, its nearly impossible to differentiate it from other types of electric guitar, especially other Fender guitars. Again, the Strat has always been emphasized as an iconic looking piece of gear, above and beyond its sound.

Contrast this with the TR-808. Everyone who knows 80s Hip Hop and electronica, can recognize the sound of the 808 without having any notion of, or need for the look!

The cultural influence of the TR-808 sound is obvious, the Stratocaster sound, not so much. Comparing Strats and 808s makes no sense any more than say, comparing the sound of the gated reverb production technique, to the look of a Rogers snare drum. 216.59.229.84 (talk) 05:28, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the thing. That comparison has been made by three separate writers in reputable publications. Your personal opinion is just that. It's a point well made, but you haven't been published by a reputable publication so anything you put into an article would be considered original research (

WP:NOTTRUTH). However, if you can find any counter opinions supported by reliable, verifiable sources then that would be a welcome addition to the article. 10mmsocket (talk) 06:43, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Calling the 808 the "Stratocaster of Electronic music" is just a self-replicating meme that gained ascendance, probably due to Wikipedia maintaining this false equivalency - an equivalency that's in the domain of marketing and promotion, versus presenting factual information. Surely, Wikipedia is more concerned with facts than hype.

No one disputes the 808 is an "origin sound" of much rap, dance and electronica from the 1980s onward, as the sources claim. However, is the Stratocaster the origin sound of rock music? No sources anywhere ever claim this. The Stratocaster certainly was not the first commercially available electric guitar. And as far as the "sound" of rock music goes, how far are unscrupulous commentators - from publications that are of general interest and not musicology or any authoritative domain - how far are they from calling Gibson guitars the "LinnDrums of rock" or some other absolute nonsensical rubbish?

Further, what can be said for other iconic gear, such as the Roland TR-909? The Marshall JCM800? Vox AC30? Gibson Les Paul? What other false equivalencies can be pedalled on their fronts? Are these the "Rolls Royces / Ferraris / Lamborghinis / Addidas' / Nikes" of their respective genres?

To keep information relevant and focused, it has to be kept honest. Presenting false equivalencies as factual, due to subjective memes catching on, says more about the confirmation bias infecting Wikipedia than presenting things on things on their own merits, especially things that are so unique, that NO equivalencies need apply.

The point being of course, is comparing apples and oranges because both are fruit makes more sense than trying to build out spurious equivalencies that actually add nothing to the discussion. BTW - the "apples and oranges" axiom exists in Western culture, because comparing false equivalencies is silly. 216.75.166.59 (talk) 07:18, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

None of that matters I'm afraid, because Wikipedia is based on what sources say. If you don't want Wikipedia to say what sources say, you have a bigger problem with the Wikipedia system and this article isn't the place to fight that battle. Popcornfud (talk) 10:40, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This was during 1982-1983, when

was huge in the UK and the US, and beforehand you had the advent of YMO and Kraftwerk during the 1970s. Wouldn't a better lead be 'Launched when sample-based drum machines were at their peak?' because it seems like alot of synth-pop favored sampled drum machines over analog drum machines, and this was why the TR-808 was relatively cheaper as all the pop groups with money seemed to favor the Linndrum and Fairlight CMI (among others). This might work as a better lead overall, imo

TuaamWiki (talk) 01:53, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That statement is based on this Fact article, which says: Roland’s TR-808 sounded thin and electronic by comparison, and at this time there simply wasn’t an appreciation for electronic music in the wider mainstream.

Wikipedia can only say what sources say, so if we want to change this we'll need some sources that say otherwise. I have added "many producers wanted more realistic drum sounds" (sourced in the body of the article) as it seems relevant for the lead. Popcornfud (talk) 02:04, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, fair enough. TuaamWiki (talk) 01:22, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Fact article is problematic, because electronic music had been growing in popularity throughout the late 1970s and early 1980s. By the time that the TR-808 was launched and popular, the Roland CR-78 had been featured on many famous pop records. The reason why the TR-808 flopped commercially at the time of its launch is because, as the article correctly says, its analogue synthesized sounds were seen as old fashioned compared to a Linn and other digital sampling devices that were appearing at the time.--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 10:09, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]