Talk:Romina Power

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Power's Glass Wall Tells All"

The subject LOOK Dec 2, 1952 "Power's glass wall mural Tells All "by artists Errand and Karen Van Leyden depicting the birth of Romina is in the closet. There seems to be some incongruities of Linda Christians description of the artworks. The next day (July20) after the interview with LOOK, it was reprocested from the Power's and sold at auction after a big controversy.

leucadianman (talk) 18:05, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Romina Power. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:36, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

brandon Martinez

The article has been vandalised. It says: "She met her singer and actor husband brandon Martinez while acting in films in the 1960s." Her husband was called as Al Bano. I'll change it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.10.154.93 (talk) 08:50, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Trimmed article and added templates

Earlier today I took the time to prune and modify this article according to various reasons listed in my editorial comments. I also added a couple of templates which bring attention to some issues with this article, including recent unsourced assertions by one particular editor. Given the intimacy of biographical material they provided and an apparently exclusive interest in this article, it appears that this editor may possibly either have an undisclosed personal relationship with the subject or may be the subject themselves. —CurryTime7-24 (talk) 06:01, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lead dispute

Last year, I took the time to prune this article a bit. It was filled with unsourced assertions, puffery, editorializing, OR, and was written (possibly by somebody connected closely with the subject) to read more like fawning ad copy than an encyclopedic article. I took a break for a few weeks earlier this year, during which time an IP editor began to restore this sub-standard material into this article. A few days ago, I removed these again. However, another editor restored the hagiographic lead I had amended; I rolled it back. Just wanted to clarify my rationale for the edits and rollbacks I've made here, in case these weren't clear. —CurryTime7-24 (talk) 18:37, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]