Talk:Ronald J Radke
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
..
you guys coulda warned me before you took out the ENTIRE court case jesus christ I referenced the ACTUAL COURT MINUTES!!! i took me a while to do that and i think its messed up, thanks for screwing up my first wikipedia experiance — Preceding unsigned comment added by FaYdid (talk • contribs) 22:38, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
Requested move
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Not moved. This was apparently changed to the redirect. Apparently there is some history on content here. The BLP issues should be resolved before someone tries to create an article on this individual. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:37, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
Ronald J Radke → Ronald Joseph Radke – I believe this article should be moved from Ronald J Radke to Ronald Joseph Rakde, Because it should the full name of the musician other than a short J acronym for Joseph. This page could also expand a little more on the history of the artist yet the article shows a good source of references to cover the current information and the name Ronnie Radke should be redirected to this article for the foreseeable future. Reverb100 (talk) 01:15, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
]
- Comment – lacking a stated reason, backed up by sources, there's nothing to consider here but an opinion. Dicklyon (talk) 05:51, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
- Comment - WP:BLP? I will contact an admin about it. Callmederek (talk) 21:14, 16 February 2012 (UTC)]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.