Talk:Ronald Poulton

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

University of Oxford Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Military history: Biography / British / European / World War I This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Military biography task force British military history task force European military history task force World War I task force Biography: Military / Sports and Games This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance). England Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Rugby union Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rugby union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rugby union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rugby unionWikipedia:WikiProject Rugby unionTemplate:WikiProject Rugby unionrugby union articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Is he by any chance the Pongo or Podge (if I remember those correctly) mentioned in Betjeman's Summoned By Bells as the nickname of a favourite ex-pupil killed in the War? --

Oxonian2006 Better late than never! 'Pongo' or 'Podge' were imaginary. The poem refers to boys - Old Dragonians (as was Betjeman) - who'd been killed in the War, but not a specific boy. That it doesn't refer to Poulton is clear from the line: He might have played for England.... The whole poem is quoted here FunkyCanute (talk) 21:19, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

This review is

transcluded from Talk:Ronald Poulton/GA1

. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MPJ-DK (talk · contribs) 19:33, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• @FunkyCanute: - I am about to start the review. Scanning the article there is a "Citation Needed" tag in there, perhaps that can be addressed while I work on the review over the next couple of days?  MPJ-DK  19:33, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA Toolbox

I like to first cover these, get them out of the way and I have seen them hit on issues.

• Disambig links - No issues detected
• External links - No issues detected, although there are a couple of sources that redirect, may become a link rot problem in the future but it is not currently an issue
• Copyvio detector - This has hits between 54.5% likely and 1.0% likely, since it is just a tool I reviewed each of them to see if there are actual issues or not. Looking at what is called out it is primarily quotes that it hits on, which is only natural. When I review the actual article I will ensure each quote is cited and appropriate. But nothing I see here makes me suspect copyright violations.

General review

Coming soon

Well Written

• TBD

Verifiable

• TBD

Broad in coverage

• TBD

Neutral

• TBD

Stable

• TBD

Illustrated

• Two pictures, I do see an issue

• File:Ronald Poulton-Palmer.jpg - is listed as being released by the copyright holder (Udufruduhu) as derivative work of the original. Problem is the original file was deleted as it did not contain any of the required information? Now given the age of the photo (106 years old) there is a legitimate claim for a fair use or free use license for this. But that's not what is listed and I am not convinced the current license is appropriate?
• File:England XV v France 1914.jpeg - Public domain tag, appropriately so.
• File:Ronald Poulton-Palmer grave.jpg - Same issue as above, but to compound the problem it refers to the same file name as the picture of Mr. Poulton-Palmer as well, which cannot be correct since one is a portrait, the other his tombstone.
• Currently I would go with N

• Editor seems to have retired, no activity on Wikipedia and no responses here. I am going to post at War and Sports projects to see if anyone is interested in picking this up or I'll fail it in 2 days.  MPJ-DK  19:43, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• I have not had any indication that anyone is willing to step up and do the GA work, so I am not going to put in the time to do a complete review, sorry but that seems like a futile effort. So I will fail this, if anyone wants to bring it back to GA feel free.  MPJ-DK  00:01, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]