Talk:Rugoconites

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Lorenzinites rarus

Would it be okay if I would have the permission to include the following line?

...But, since a synonym of this genus is "Lorenzinities" , there might be three species because there exists a species called

Lorenzinites rarus
, which is though to actually be a cnidarian , or either a misshapen fossil specimen of a rugoconites"

I am including this line because I want to also say that Lorenzinities is a synonym for the genus , and that the species L. rarus is part of the Lorenzinities group , but , doesn't share any similarities with both R. enigmaticus or R. tenuirugosus. And that it might actually be a

CnidarianRugoconites Tenuirugosus (talk) 09:40, 20 February 2022 (UTC)User:Rugoconites_Tenuirugosus[reply
]

This sounds like
WP:OR, which is not unacceptable here. Please cite a reliable source on this page first and quote the text upon which you might base any such edit upon. I no longer have much confidence in your abilities to understand and differentiate published expert opinion by scientists from your own amateur sleuthing and guesswork. Nick Moyes (talk) 01:18, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply
]