Talk:Rustavi 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.


Is it true? Alæxis¿question? 09:07, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, I was under the impression that this text was deleted... Alæxis¿question? 09:55, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mouthpiece of government

An editor is removing the statement that Rustavi 2 is considered as a Saakashvili mouthpiece, claiming the source doesn't state this. The source states:

The Georgian daily, Rezonansi, wrote on August 30 that the top management of Imedi TV – in charge of news and political programming - is now composed of people with close links to the authorities. It also noted sarcastically that Imedi TV might become a “Rustavi 3” – a reference to Rustavi 2 TV, which is a private television station, but is regarded as a government mouthpiece.

The statement is clearly referenced by that statement, unless of course Saakashvili is not the head of the government in Georgia? --

Dialogue Stalk me 23:35, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Hey Russkie, what's up! That's what happens when you have free newspapers in the country. They can criticize the government as much as they want. That particular article is very critical of Saakashvili and his government. So, we can't just put that information on the encyclopedia without backing it up with something else. Does it make sense, buddy? KOBA (talk) 23:43, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
First, I'm not Russian. Second, is civil.ge a reliable source or not? If it is, then if it says it is a mouthpiece, then we can say so on the article. Third, you are right, WP is not Soviet-era Pravda, but at the same time, it is not Saakashvili-era Rustavi 2, in which investigations are not carried out on Saakashvili and his government, and which is censored by the Georgian government. Got that one, Gruzinsky? --
Dialogue Stalk me 02:52, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply
]
FYI, Gruzinsky can mean either a surname or an adjective, but not an ethnic designation. --KoberTalk 16:53, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think he meant Gruzin. SkyBonTalk\Contributions 18:30, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The dropping of
Russian invation to Georgia
goals. So evrything Saakashvili doing becoming bad, Rustavi 2 is Saakashvili's Pravda ect. Mikheil Saakashvili is not departing fo K.G.B like Putin or Medevdev. He grow up in democratic country and adherent democracy.
anyway, nobody her is media scientist, and conclusion like User:Russavia come to are not acceptable.
she wrot this sentence:
"being viewed as the mouthpiece of the Saakashvili government in [[Tbilisi]"
pleas notice that there are international parameters for freedom of the media. So pleas delete the miserable sentence. Geagea (talk) 02:55, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Firstly, Medvedev ISN'T a former KGB agent like Putin - he is civil. Secondly, Main target of invasion was a defence of South Ossetia. If you have your brains washed then plz go to mental hospital. WP is not a forum. From now such new msgs will be deleted shortly as discussion page IS NOT a forum (look at the template above). SkyBonTalk\Contributions 18:38, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
SkyBon. Can I ask you to stop trolling? If you really care about the integrity of this talk page, first delete personal attacks against other users.--KoberTalk 07:45, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Mr. Kober, in Russian it is called "You are a fool yourself". (Russian: "Сам дурак") SkyBonTalk\Contributions 14:00, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to delete plz delete your dirrty Language. Geagea (talk) 00:58, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
WP is not censored, and if a multitude of sources (Georgian and American mind you) state that Rustavi 2 is a mouthpiece of Saakashvili's government, then it stays. I don't care what any editors opinions are, as they don't care what mine are, but when
Dialogue Stalk me 04:32, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply
]
Newspapers are soures for news. so they can be reliable sources for news. opinion, gossip and others should be considerd as it opinion, gossip ect. The only reliable sources for a such severe accusation is academic work.
Nevertheless, I try to find thos sourses you mention but find nothing. Pleas give us the link to the specific articles that we can check them as wall. Geagea (talk) 23:50, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know how they teach research in Russia but when I was taught writing, I was told that I should use facts instead of 'hard statements'. Calling a private television a 'mouthpiece' of somebody is a controversial statement; so, let us refrain from that. KOBA (talk) 03:23, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
What makes one think I am Russian? I suggest people go read
Dialogue Stalk me 00:34, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply
]
Still you did not give us even one link for source that I can check if you understand correctly the link. Maybe if you do so I can convince your point. Geagea (talk) 00:51, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The statement is sourced to one reference (civil.ge), and then Gigla83 took issue to it, so another 5 sources were supplied. They are right there in the article. --
Dialogue Stalk me 01:01, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply
]
Gigla's attempt to make the passage more neutral is legitimate and much welcomed.--KoberTalk 07:48, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

--88.210.253.71 (talk) 08:55, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Georgian expert needed

A person fluent in Georgian is needed to get current info about the station.JacobiJonesJr (talk) 04:37, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Rustavi 2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:06, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Rustavi_2&oldid=1200771232"