Talk:SMS Rheinland

Good topic candidate	Promoted
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 22, 2010. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that in order to refloat her after running aground off Finland in 1918, SMS Rheinland needed 6,400 metric tons of equipment removed, more than a third of her normal displacement ?
Current status: Featured article

This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Ships This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles Military history: Maritime / European / German / World War I / Operation Majestic Titan This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Associated task forces: /  Maritime warfare task force European military history task force German military history task force World War I task force Operation Majestic Titan (Phase I) Additional information: /  This article has passed an A-Class review. Germany Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This review is

transcluded from Talk:SMS Rheinland/GA1

. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:19, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   Fix the things I've noted in the text.

   I reworded the first and clarified the second. How does it look now? Parsecboy (talk) 02:20, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

   B. MoS compliance:

   Publisher location needed for Tarrant

   Added. Parsecboy (talk) 02:20, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it
   neutral
   ?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have

   fair use rationales

   :

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with

   suitable captions

   :

   Is another picture available?

   I haven't been able to find any other images of the ship; there's a somewhat bad linedrawing in the 1911 Brasseys (here) - that might be worth uploading and adding to the article. I did add a photo of the Black Prince to the Jutland section. Parsecboy (talk) 02:20, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

   I like plan views for all of these early dreadnoughts so you can show what the odd turret arrangements looked like rather than relying only on a textual description. But it's your call, though I'd look for a better scan than that one.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

5 in the infobox, 6 in the text -- possibly in all the articles for the class Suppongoche (talk) 17:58, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch, fixed. Parsecboy (talk) 00:15, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]