Talk:SR Q1 class

	SR Q1 class has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result July 15, 2007 Good article nominee Listed August 11, 2008 Good article reassessment Kept
Current status: Good article

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Trains: in UK / Locomotives Mid‑importance Trains Portal DYK April 13, 2007 Sel week 6, 2008 This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated projects or task forces: /  This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by the Locomotives task force.

Archives

Archive 1, 2005 discussions

Please do not place any further Thomas the Tank engine information on this article, as there is already enough information on that page, which one can reach via the link in this article. Please keep Wikipedia tidy! Cheers. --Bulleid Pacific 13:55, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here are my comments having reviewed the article for

• Follow
  WP:MOS
  for section headings, e.g. "The Design" should be "Design", (no "The"), "Livery and Numbering" should be "Livery and Numbering" (no over-capitalisation), "References/Footnotes" should probably be two sections, "References" and "Notes".
• Personal pref, wikilink Oliver Bulleid in the lead, he's significant.
• Personal pref,
  Second World War, not World War II (sounds like a movie sequel). Plus it's inconsistent between the lead and the opening paragraph of the Background section. Plus there's a World War I later on as well. NB. The World War I reference is regarding to Bulleid's earlier career in the army transportation service, where he rose in rank from Lieutenant to Major. I'll change to First World War.--Bulleid Pacific 11:40, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• "'Austerity'" or "austerity" or austerity, consistency needed.

• "(like Bulleid's "West Country/Battle of Britain" and "Merchant Navy" classes)" why in parentheses? Just use a pair of commas.
• Livery and numbering section has unnecessary subsections in my opinion, it breaks the prose up too much. I think you could merge all the sections. Merged Southern sections to build up section with better prose, though section does need to be split for ease of reference as regards livery and time periods involved.--Bulleid Pacific 11:33, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Placement of 33038 is awkward (on my browser at least), perhaps if the livery & numbering section is reworked into a single section, the image could be placed at the top on the right and would look better. Ok, I've moved it further up, though it portrays the loco in Nationalised livery, and so it needs to stick with that section. I think it loos better where it is now. What do you think?--Bulleid Pacific 11:33, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• You need a reference for the Locomotive in fiction claim.

I think these issues can be easily resolved so I'll put the GA on hold in order to allow time for them. By all means ignore the personal preferences, they're just suggestions, but do try to be consistent whatever you choose. The Rambling Man 11:54, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done remedial work. See my own notes for my own reasons on some of the changes.--Bulleid Pacific 11:33, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion is

Currently working on this article, though its getting late. Will return tomorrow. --Bulleid Pacific (talk) 00:48, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, now done. Article is due for a major overhaul anyway to prepare it for FA soon.--Bulleid Pacific (talk) 11:37, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That looks geat now, thanks. Good luck with the FAC! --

talk) 14:28, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Since this is a GA it's not wise to add such comments, 'hearsay' is not a Reliable Source, and anyway 'Charlies' is already present with a {{fact}} tag in the lede. Anyone got a definite reference for the name 'Charlies' yet? -- EdJogg (talk) 13:23, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article has just been used in one of the preserved steam communities to ridicule WP in general over the factual inaccuracy of WP's articles. Nothing unusual there, but this one is also a GA. Boiler dimensions are missing and those that are here are both uncited, not credible and stated to be simply wrong. Does anyone have good SR sources to work on improving this? Andy Dingley (talk) 12:47, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've added some from Bradley; is anything lacking from what I added? --Redrose64 (talk) 13:41, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

is C h2 the correct thing because im having some doubts that its not right, thanks 73.250.53.193 (talk) 22:20, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

C=three coupled axles; h-superheated; 2=two cylinders. Yes. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 19:08, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The class became the basis for Neville the Q1 for Thomas and Friends carrying the number 33010, which was worn by a real Q1 that was scrapped in 1964. 77.234.64.84 (talk) 13:38, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I refer you to

WP:FANCRUFT. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 00:53, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]