This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bulgaria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bulgaria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BulgariaWikipedia:WikiProject BulgariaTemplate:WikiProject BulgariaBulgaria articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Blessed Virgin Mary quite rightly have separate entries. ... etc. Don't you agree? Wetman
08:38, 15 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Sabaoth
User:Error, since you're convinced by the reference in Britannica linking Sabazios with "Sabaoth", perhaps you'd give an explanation of what's referred to by "From Val. Max. i. 3, 2, it has been concluded that Sabazius was identified in ancient times..." etc. The original quote being referred to would do. Thank you. Wetman 01:12, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)
1.3.3 EXEMPLUM 3. Par.Cn. Cornelius Hispalus praetor peregrinus M. Popilio Laenate L. Calpurnio coss. edicto Chaldaeos citra decimum diem abire ex urbe atque Italia iussit, leuibus et ineptis ingeniis fallaci siderum interpretatione quaestuosam mendaciis suis caliginem inicientes. idem Iudaeos, qui Sabazi Iouis cultu Romanos inficere mores conati erant, repetere domos suas coegit.
EXEMPLUM 3. Nep. Chaldaeos igitur Cornelius Hispalus urbe expulit et intra decem dies Italia abire iussit, ne peregrinam scientiam uenditarent. Iudaeos quoque, qui Romanis tradere sacra sua conati erant, idem Hispalus urbe exterminauit arasque priuatas e publicis locis abiecit.
1.3.2 doesn't seem to mention Jews or Sabazius. It seems that there are two versions of the paragraph. Ask the 1911 redactors.
"Later Greek mythographers reduced Cybele's role to 'wife,' but initially Gordias ruled in the Goddess's name as her visible representative."
Anyone with a source for such a fundamentally obvious statement, better yet, supported by a quote, would serve the article well by editing and restoring an improved and extended version of this rather commonplace statement about the role of any archaic king. Meanwhile, alert users of Wikipedia do always read the Talkpages. --Wetman (talk) 01:21, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Always on horseback?
The final sentence in the introductory paragraph, "representations of him, even into Roman times, show him always on horseback, as a nomadic horseman god, wielding his characteristic staff of power." is directly contradicted by the reference: Eugene N. Lane, "Towards a definition of the iconography of Sabazius", Numen 27 (1980:9-33) in which the author takes inventory of depictions of Sabazius and accompanying iconography. While both characteristics (horseback and wielding a staff) are found in some depictions (individually or together), they appear, based on the Lane article, far from universal, perhaps even quite rare. I don't want to start an edit war, as I'm far from an expert on the subject, but perhaps this line should be removed, or at least re-worded? Placenta Juan (talk) 16:35, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm guessing that this has to do with how Sabazius was understood in the syncretized religious environment of the High Roman Empire. So perhaps that distinction could be made: between the 'original' rider, and the imperial syncretism? At any rate, please don't feel inhibited by the possible perception of edit warring. Just give it a shot, and if you meet with opposition, then we'll all just try to work it out. Cynwolfe (talk) 17:38, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]