Talk:Sahara Las Vegas

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Gambling Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gambling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gambling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GamblingWikipedia:WikiProject GamblingTemplate:WikiProject GamblingGambling articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Gambling To-do: edit history watch purge Current collaborations: Improve an article to FA Improve an article to A Help with the Gambling articles needing attention. Tag the talk pages of Gambling-related articles with the {{WikiProject Gambling}} banner. The link to the Missouri gambling site is now out of date and needs to be updated. Japan section reads as though it was written by the gambling industry - quotes of 160% returns are 'citation needed'. project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Not really much of a discussion, but the new "Closing" section is a direct copy of the news article that is referenced at the end of it. It needs to be rewritten in an original manner, not a direct copy. --Cygnusloop99 (talk) 04:16, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I heard that the building is to be demolished now that it is closed. Could anyone find a source for that? The Mysterious El Willstro (talk) 02:35, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Per KTNV, there are no plans. So finding a

source could be difficult. Vegaswikian (talk) 06:07, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Pratt, Timothy (2011-05-16). "Las Vegas' once-glamorous Sahara hotel-casino closes". Reuters.

While the source does indeed say that, it's only true for a bizarre interpretation of "post-World War II". Every resort on the strip was built post-World War II; we're still in the post-World War II era, and we will be in that era forevermore. I changed it to indicate that the Tropicana, the Flamingo, and the Riviera are the only pre-1960 resorts left on the Strip. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:16, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What does "The Sahara anchored the northern end of the Las Vegas Strip" mean? 86.132.223.12 (talk) 16:09, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20131015193156/http://www.nclsales.com:80/liquidation-sales/ to http://www.nclsales.com/liquidation-sales/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—

They really should, the Sahara was a historic resort and deserves its own article and the SLS is a different thing and should have it's own article. The only reason for them to be combined is commercial and it's dishonest. No other casino article redirects to the one that replaced it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2a02:c7d:4ef2:2a00:9c70:6cbb:e3e8:4d8e (talk • contribs) 11:47, October 27, 2017 (UTC)

It's the same building, though with extensive renovations. Other casinos in the same situation, like Barbary Coast/Bill's/Cromwell and Imperial Palace/Quad/Linq, also have one combined article. Toohool (talk) 05:17, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If the two totally separate entities of the Sahara and the SLS should be combined because they shared the same foundations then maybe every article on a country should be combined with all its historic iterations; in fact maybe every geographical location should be combined into the same article as they were once part of the same landmass. The other combined locations noted were not nearly as significant as the Sahara in either fame or influence and in this case is as unwarranted as if Desert Inn redirected to the Wynn. The combining of the articles is as the other poster said, very shallow, dishonest and purely commercial. Thankfully we'll soon be rid of this testament to Sam Nazarian's ego. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:6BB8:3200:45FF:CD28:35E8:92AB (talk) 13:30, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DaFuze164 (talk · contribs) just split the Sahara into a separate article, though we haven't done that in the past where the new casino shares the same property without being a teardown, especially now that the property has been renamed back to its original name. I don't think there needs to be two separate articles here. Starting a talk page discussion before doing any AfDs. SportingFlyer T·C 23:44, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just because you haven't done it in the past doesn't mean you shouldn't do. It just means you haven't really thought about it. They should be 2 separate pages since the original Sahara officially closed on May 16, 2011. While the SLS opened 3 years later and before that, the property was closed but was being fully remodeled. The only thing that didn't change was that the building wasn't demolished. Everything else was though. DaFuze164 (talk) 02:10, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• We're going to be moving this entire page to Sahara Hotel and Casino in a couple months, so it doesn't make sense to split the old one out at all. I know the original was liquidated, but having two separate pages will be confusing. SportingFlyer T·C 05:11, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Should be kept as one article, which is common practice in a case like this. The SLS name had a short run when considering the resort's 67-year history. I think the SLS history and renovations do not make up enough content to warrant a separate page, and it would be better to keep it all together.  AJFU  (talk) 20:41, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Every Del Webb Sahara (Vegas, Reno, Tahoe) had a steakhouse called the House of Lords. Why? 2A00:23C3:E284:900:15E7:7985:C625:63BB (talk) 15:37, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• C-987349729.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:38, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone local around, who could take a few new pictures? The only recent one got deleted these days, because the licensing tag was incorrect. Particularly the new Sahara signage and the entrance would be of interest. Interiors are nice but not as important. Can you help? --h-stt !? 14:03, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]