Talk:Sanctuary of the Three Gauls

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Religion Low‑importance Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Celts Low‑importance Sanctuary of the Three Gauls is within the scope of WikiProject Celts, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the ancient Celts and the modern day Celtic nations. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article or you can visit the Assess.CeltsWikipedia:WikiProject CeltsTemplate:WikiProject CeltsCelts articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Historic sites Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. France Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Gaul Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gaul, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gaul on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GaulWikipedia:WikiProject GaulTemplate:WikiProject GaulGaul articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article contains a translation of Sanctuaire fédéral des trois Gaules from fr.wikipedia.

This article has direct relevance to the Roman

and its sub-topics. "Federal sanctuary of the three Gauls" is an adequate working title but the "sanctuary complex" is named after the entity of Tres Galliae (therefore in English, Three Gauls (proper noun). "Federal sanctuary" seems slightly problematic as a descriptor - I've not yet come across a better, but possibly will, in which case I'll submit it on the talk page. The "cult centre" at Lugdunum was extremely important in the development of Gallo-Roman and European culture. Most of the information in the article as it stands is supported by modern scholarship, some is not, and more is required. I've good scholarly sources and will do what I can.

Is it possible to change the heading without making too many waves elsewhere? Regards. Haploidavey (talk) 13:29, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to be the usage on the museum's own site and in the book Becoming Roman By Greg Woolf (or Three Gauls sanctuary), though I agree it is a little clunky. As for 'federal', it's an adjective for sanctuary not Tres Galliae, and a problematic translation for allied, treaty-bound etc (see

foedus). To avoid the federal problem, I'll try Sanctuary of the Three Gauls - which, with that capitalisation, is also ok as a translation of Tres Galliae as a single entity.Neddyseagoon - talk 15:16, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Our first edit conflict! I was going to say that your alternative seems fine to me - the Three Gauls implies federation well enough. Haploidavey (talk) 15:22, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fishwick gives a very detailed chronological account of ara and templum. The templum dates from Hadrian's time, and the pillars originate from this later rebuilding. Fishwick is cautious and scholarly: the Hadrianic pillars might be the source of the support-work for the cupola. The phased development's very interesting... will change text accordingly. Haploidavey (talk) 23:02, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]