Talk:Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Comics: Webcomics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Webcomics.

Interpretation vs. Incarnation: Interpretation works too. It's an interpretation of the same type of humor in a different format. I used interpretation because the word incarnation had already been used a few times in the article. I'll be respectful and keep the change since you've expressed a preference. Please don't flame. Explain your differences without being petty or name-calling. Rmj12345 06:45, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The following appears in the body of the article:

"The majority of the comics feature a man with brown hair and a green shirt. He is always in the bottom-left corner of the strip when he appears (although he is always a different person)."

I've checked the archives, and while it's true that Weiner has a tendency to give his characters a green shirt, and many of these have brown hair, the included text overstates things. Also, when this man shows up, it isn't always in the bottom-left corner.

A conservative guess would place the regularity of this character-type in less than 5% of the SMBC strips; I propose the statement be removed from the article. I would have done so myself, but there seems to be some tension between some editors on this article at the moment. GreenCrayon 13:06, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Good idea. I'll go ahead and delete it, if there are no other objections. --Rmj12345 18:51, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Should it note that it was not a serious response? Some people think he actually accused her of stealing the joke. --Raijinili 02:22, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It'd be fine with me. Rmj12345 06:24, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Like many single panel comics, there are no recurring characters." Moloch was in 3 comics I believe, and there may be a few other recurring characters (not counting characters like Jesus, Batman, etc.) Perhaps this sentence should be amended. --Pdeq 12:04, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest changing it to "Like many single panel comics, SMBC does not focus on recurring characters." That, or similar, should be appropriate. :) --Muna (talk) 17:38, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would agree that the humor in SMBC is unusual, but I've never heard of an actual genre 'bizare humor'. Is there not a better genre that could be used in the infobox? Jamesmarshall90 (talk) 18:03, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SMBC stopped being single paneled a couple of years ago, yet the article mentions it as such several times. This should be changed, right? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.195.36.64 (talk • contribs)

Changed, thanks. ~EdGl! 16:24, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

After reading over many of these comics, should we also add highly sexual themes as one of the recurring themes? Much of the humor that I observed wouldn't fall under "dating," per say, but more simple crude sexual humor. fractalecho 13:08, 10 June 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fractalecho (talk • contribs)

I revived the

• Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Some additional sources at links above. :) Cheers, — Cirt (talk) 04:34, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:SMBC comic 25 March 2008, with caption.png will be appearing as picture of the day on October 10, 2015. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2015-10-10. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:53, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the day

A panel from

Zach Weiner

Archive – More featured pictures...