Talk:Screenlife

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Film: Filmmaking This article is supported by the Filmmaking task force. Internet Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This movie should not be in the list. There is no computer screen at all. It belongs more in the found footage category. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meorioa3 (talk • contribs) 19:59, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think the history section focuses too much on him and not other screenlife creators? 2001:4453:5F7:6400:1DD8:5103:C8A8:F359 (talk) 07:56, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not to mention it says Unfriended was the "first full-length screenlife film" when it clearly shows it wasn't, right here in this article alone. The Den was just as long as Unfriended and came out a year before it, and Open Windows was longer and came out before it. 🤨 I think he feels ownership of the genre (which has a terrible name, screen-, sure, but -life? No, that sounds awful for the name of the genre). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.242.36.241 (talk) 01:36, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve checked the history and it turns out a paid editor connected to the infamous User:Bodiadub is behind the pro-Bekmambetov edits. Some professional cleanup is definitely required here. 49.144.200.182 (talk) 10:23, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]