Talk:Second Epistle to the Corinthians

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconBible Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconChristianity Top‑importance
WikiProject icon
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconAncient Near East Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ancient Near East related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconBooks
WikiProject icon

Cleanup-Rewrite

Untitled

I don't know what's happened to this page but it has become a total mess. There are numerous facts but much less citation and it's my personal opinion that the number of quotes on this page is extremely excessive. To make matters worse, it has somehow been blended with the talk page (perhaps vandalism?). Given the significance of this article and the severity of the problem, I'd say it's in need of immediate attention that is beyond the scope of my humble editing abilities. Thank you Finn zee Fox (talk) 06:30, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think that these Bible book pages are interesting only for Christians (and such) of the more zealous kind - they deserve some general stories based on some main stream Christian interpretations (archbishop of Cantebury, papal and the counterparts for Lutheran and Calvinists), but doesn't get the proper attention for the risk of conflicts, so that the pages in practice serve as grafitti boards for fundamentalist passers-by personal interpretations. Some systematic collaboration might be a solution. Said: Rursus () 09:24, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Such collaboration could be incredibly effective in protecting these pages. Likewise, could it be useful, or even possible, to grant these pages semi-protection? Finn zee Fox (talk) 02:23, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Epistle to the Romans which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 16:29, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This move discussion has been closed - BobKilcoyne (talk) 01:14, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Second Epistle to the Corinthians. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:15, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reference to Paul's brother Titus

Should this article say that this book of the New Testament implies that Titus was Paul's brother? In it, he says that because he did not find his brother Titus, he went on to Macedonia. YTKJ (talk) 21:24, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]