Talk:Separation of Panama from Colombia

This  level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Colombia Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Colombia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Colombia-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ColombiaWikipedia:WikiProject ColombiaTemplate:WikiProject ColombiaColombia articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. inactive .PanamaWikipedia:WikiProject PanamaTemplate:WikiProject PanamaPanama articles

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist. [[History of Peru#Reconstruction, the Aristocratic Republic, and Leguía's 11-year rule (1884–1930)|Peru]] The anchor (#Reconstruction, the Aristocratic Republic, and Leguía's 11-year rule (1884–1930)) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before. Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

"Colombia then sent later a delegation of prominent politicians... this time aboard the United States ship USS Canada without reaching any consensus."

I find it unlikely that the United States would have a ship named after another country. Furthermore, the page it directs to (USS Canada NCC- 79114) sounds like a Star Trek fan site. I doubt that a USS Canada ever existed (and certainly not NCC-79114) and somebody should look into it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.180.204.51 (talk) 16:31, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agree USS Canada is higly unlikely. Additionally, "and also proposed making Panama City the capital of Colombia' is highly unlikely and not mentioned in the reference. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.254.237.113 (talk) 23:41, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Dictionary of American Naval Fighting Ships (http://www.history.navy.mil/danfs/c2-list.htm) has no mention of a "USS Canada". The concept is laughable on it's face. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vdpittman (talk • contribs) 04:41, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agree -- added "Dubious" tag. ~E 74.60.29.141 (talk) 06:39, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is the Esmeralda used: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esmeralda_(1791) Not this one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_cruiser_Izumi Just need to change the link. I forgot how to do it. Spanish colony with a Spanish ship. I doubt a Japanese cruizer like that was used — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.168.48.20 (talk) 12:00, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do we need to use pejorative terminology? Why not use "independence" which is politically neutral? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.77.196.187 (talk) 20:16, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]