Talk:Sepsis cynipsea

Sepsis cynipsea was nominated as a Natural sciences good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (February 2, 2020). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Diptera High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Diptera, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of flies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DipteraWikipedia:WikiProject DipteraTemplate:WikiProject DipteraDiptera articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. Insects High‑importance

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 August 2019 and 4 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Hannahwhite97. Peer reviewers: Andrewoh29, Lelandra, KendalTLee.

Above undated message substituted from

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 January 2020 and 14 May 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lisophie886.

Above undated message substituted from

I am working on updating this Wikipedia page. A lot of the information I am finding is about reproduction and sexual selection. I need to find more sources on other behaviors, distribution, taxonomy, ecology, evolution, etc.Hannahwhite97 (talk) 01:29, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I updated some hyperlinks to add more info to this page and evaluated it on the quality of the page as C-class. (Y.shiuan) 09:59, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Overall a solid article. I did not see too many red flags or blatant errors. Be sure to double check some of your citing – the formatting was a little strange for some in-text citations. I went and changed some minor sentence phrasing, but I didn’t make too many edits – I thought most of it was solid on its own. I did change the name of the “Behavior” section to “Mating”, as I thought it to be a more appropriate, relevant title to the section itself. andrewoh29 23:11, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This article was very accurate, yet engaging. I thought it was very accessible to read and could be used as a source for anyone seeking to do a project or research Sepsis cynipsea. There were just a few grammatical changes I made to the page like excess commas, but other than a few small edits, there wasn't really a large need to change any of the content of this Wiki. Great job! lelandra 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Short but decent introduction and not just a regurgitation of the what the fly is, but gives the reader an idea of the research surrounding the fly and why the fly is researched. Added some links to words in order for the reader to get a better idea of the fly and pull the article "together". Overall, I thought it was really well written.KendalTLee (talk) 03:06, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]