I really think the first description should be cited. Here it is: [1]
It's already there?
Other common names for the species include Seram mountain-pigeon and Seram long-tailed mountain-pigeon.[6][7] – Please create a redirect for the other name, and I don't think the "-" makes a separate name.
Done.
As I suggested for the other mountain pigeon articles, a sentence with context about the genus would be very helpful.
Added.
The Seram mountain pigeon was previously considered to be a subspecies of the Buru mountain pigeon, but was split on the basis of differences in appearance.[9] – Needs detail: Who classified it as a subspecies, and when? What was the scientific name? And who did move it back into its own species again, and when? When was it moved into Gymnophaps, and by whom? These are important aspects of the taxonomic history.
Added.
Great to have this egg photograph, that is awesome. But that article contains a second photo, showing the position of the nest. Can we add this as well? Would be more useful than the general photo of the forest, or, alternatively, could be placed side-by-side with the egg photo in an image plate (see Lythronax, the plate in section "Paleobiology", for an example what I mean). --Jens Lallensack (talk) 22:35, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Replaced the image of forest with one of the position of nest.
