Talk:Serology

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Medicine Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

What about the alternative (UK/Australian) spelling? i.e., seriology, seriological, etc. Just for those non-Americans out there who search on that spelling and get nowhere. Belmop (talk) 05:27, 9 February 2009 (UTC) diagnostic identification to detect antobodies —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.99.178.255 (talk) 17:21, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

here is some of the Immunology books, hope it could help those who in college.

BOOK^{[1] [2] [3]}

--36.225.96.5 (talk) 06:34, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Serum concentrations" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

talk) 19:01, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

“Protein” is Not Listed in Other Dictionaries

The specific word ‘protein’ does not appear in other dictionaries and should be omitted from the definition. It is a biased word link only to protein gene form of what has been deemed an immunity booster and should not be considered an actual immunization. The constant need for booster shots proves the body does not identify the mRNA as a vaccination. mRNA has failed in many laboratory settings and I believe was pushed into the medicine out of fear. The protein should be edited out. 2600:8801:A91A:6800:6452:7A71:A9AF:B669 (talk) 09:00, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]