Talk:Short film

So...

...in America, the definition of "short subject" was almost the same as the American definition of "featurette"? What was the point of having the word "featurette", then? And what exactly did they call films shorter than 20 minutes? Esn 11:12, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please Add Shortfilms.com Link

...Hello, Our company have developed a website purely for filmmakers to upload their Short Films for free. Please visit

Shortfilms.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.41.53.38 (talk) 02:34, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've never heard a short film called a short subject

Shouldn't the redirect be the other way around? --72.138.186.64 10:54, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Probably: the former does seem like both the most common term, and the contextually clearer. (Note that it's the main article for Category:short films, for example, not Category:short subjects.) Alai 17:22, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I say the lemma should be "short film". No-one says "short subject". Maikel (talk) 20:52, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like an obvious case of prioritizing technical terminology over common names. Someone should make a

move request

.

Peter ^Isotalo 14:10, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to add a link to this article

Hi, I'm Hrish Thota from FilmCamp.TV. Our site is a collection of what we call "New Indian Cinema". It is a collection of short films from India just in the same way as BritFilms.TV is for Britian. Request you to please let add the following link to this article:

FilmCamp.TV - a collection of professionally made short films and movies from India.

can i change this article:??????????? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.94.141.5 (talk) 21:14, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

www.filmcamp.tv

thankyou, hrish —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hrish.thota (talk • contribs) 14:28, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Joe McDoakes title card.jpg

The image

requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation

linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --11:33, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bias

I never even heard of the industry term "short subject" before I tried to link to short film. The lead appears to be written from the perspective of film buffs rather than the average reader. Please fix this as soon as possible.

Peter ^Isotalo 18:59, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It says in the header: The description is now used almost interchangeably with short film'. Like all the others that have commented above, I too have never heard of the term "short subject", so this statement is probably incorrect these days. hence the move request below.

clipman 16:02, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Moved to Short film. While the discussion here was sparse, there were no objections and the category is Category:Short films. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:19, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

clipman 15:21, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Neutral but if it is to be moved it should be to Short film with lower case f, since it's not a proper noun. Station1 (talk) 05:25, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Short Film Talks

Please add this site to your links. This site features news, reviews and views about short films.

www.shortfilmtalks.tk —Preceding unsigned comment added by RadoRed (talk • contribs) 16:39, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WorldCat Genres

Hello, I'm working with OCLC, and we are algorithmically generating data about different Genres, like notable Authors, Book, Movies, Subjects, Characters and Places. We have determined that this Wikipedia page has a close affintity to our detected Genere of short-films. It might be useful to look at [1] for more information. Thanks. Maximilianklein (talk) 23:51, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]