Talk:Slaty-backed forktail

Slaty-backed forktail has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: September 5, 2017. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Slaty-backed forktail appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 September 2017 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the call of the slaty-backed forktail can easily be mistaken for that of the Blyth's kingfisher?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2017/September. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Slaty-backed forktail.

Wikipedia

Birds Low‑importance

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Birds To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Wikify : Ninox boobook ocellata • The Institute for Bird Populations (more)
Other : Add photos to bird articles needing photos (search Flickr for free images

). Add taxonomic authorities to genus articles.

More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo.

Nepal Low‑importance

	Nepal portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is
transcluded from Talk:Slaty-backed forktail/GA1
. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer:

talk · contribs) 11:32, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

I'll take this one.

talk) 11:32, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

I'm passing this. This is my 59th GAN review and only the second one I've felt deserved to be passed immediately. I'm being picky, but the only things I would change would be wikilinking

talk) 11:59, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Many thanks,

Freikorp! I think we may have just given some watchers whiplash, going from this to GA in 25 hours ;) Vanamonde (talk) 12:23, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Oh wow, I didn't actually notice how recent the improvements were. That's pretty amazing :).

talk) 12:32, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply

]