Talk:Society finch

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Society finch article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Birds Low‑importance

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Birds To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Wikify : Ninox boobook ocellata • The Institute for Bird Populations (more)
Other : Add photos to bird articles needing photos (search Flickr for free images

). Add taxonomic authorities to genus articles.

More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo.

Sexing Bengalese Finches

The page states a method of sexing Bengalese finches by comparing the shapes of their heads and beaks. I thought they are generally considered a monomorphic species meaning they can't be sexed solely by looks.

Citation seems dubious and considering the source is a personal page, probably unreliable. Would like to remove that paragraph to avoid spreading false information.

KwRIOT (talk) 13:33, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removing it would be fine with me. —JerryFriedman (Talk) 16:28, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. KwRIOT (talk) 18:35, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on

nobots

|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070928050454/http://kairosnewsletter.net/bb/breeding_intro.html to http://kairosnewsletter.net/bb/breeding_intro.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—

Talk to my owner:Online 18:46, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Two Males as the Best Foster Parents

Is there a source for the claim that two males make the best foster parents? This site claims male-female pairings are the most effective, and also says that a trio of males works too. This article says that sex doesn't matter, but that, anecdotally, some finch breeders prefer a pair of males because they won't have eggs of their own to take care of. Similarly, this webpage mentions how many prefer to use pairs of two males, but the author says they prefer male-female pairs and doesn't say one is better than the other. This article claims that any combination of a pairing (for both sex and sometimes different species foster parents) and doesn't make any statement about the efficacy any of the types of pairings. The article references the book Society Finches as Foster Parents by Robert Black, which may be worth reading if anyone can get their hands on it. This webpage does say that two males work the best which is pretty good and might be useful as a source but since there's conflicting information in other sources I'd like to see some discussion. I EAT PINBALLS (talk) 18:58, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

After thinking about it some more, these sources might provide enough justification to say that "breeders typically prefer two males" and maybe mention it's cuz they don't have their own eggs or something like that. I EAT PINBALLS (talk) 23:06, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]