Talk:Sortu

Spain

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Socialism

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Politics: Political parties

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Political parties task force.

In article with for a mistake. In the first paragraph, it reads,

In Ezker abertzalea with for the first time a rejection of ETA's violence.

To a reader without inside knowledge of Basque politics, the first few words of this sentence resembles word salad. Knowing that the term "Ezker abertzalea" essentially means "Basque nationalist leftists" makes the sentence sort of make sense, but it still doesn't read well. What is "in" Ezker abertzalea, and what is Ezker abertzalea "with"? Does the sentence really mean, "The Basque nationalist left rejects ETA's violence for the first time", or is there something missing from the sentence? I hope someone with better understanding of the subject can clean this up. --FeygeleGoy/פֿײגעלע גױ‎ (talk) 18:31, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. How about now? Akerbeltz (talk) 18:55, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]