Talk:Soulbury Commission

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Sri Lanka High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sri Lanka, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sri Lanka on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sri LankaWikipedia:WikiProject Sri LankaTemplate:WikiProject Sri LankaSri Lanka articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. British Empire Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Empire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Empire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British EmpireWikipedia:WikiProject British EmpireTemplate:WikiProject British EmpireBritish Empire articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This whole article is biased towards to Sinhalese view and contains very inaccurate information regarding GG & ITAK. I have corrected some but there are still many to be corrected!

Agreed. This article is not just biased, it's factually incorrect. GG did not ask for 50% representation for the Sri Lanka Tamils, he asked for 50% for non-Sinhalese (35% were non-Sinhalese in the 1930's). This is just another lie spread by Sinhalese nationalists which over time has become "fact".--obi2canibe^{talk contr} 16:36, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This article (the original version), or at least part of it, seems to be based on J. R. Jayewardene of Sri Lanka: 1906-1956. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 16:18, 12 March 2024 (UTC).[reply]