Talk:South Carolina Lowcountry

This article was nominated for deletion on 21 December 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: South Carolina Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject South Carolina (assessed as Top-importance).

{{editprotected}} Please add Sea Pines Montessori to the list of schools. It is a private school next door to Hilton Head Prep.Lowcountrywriter (talk) 13:35, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lowcountrywriter (talk) 13:35, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have lived here all my life, and I have never heard of that school. Skiendog (talk) 04:35, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's one of those montessori school things that aren't accredited by any organization other than their own, and only go for a few grades... that kind of thing. they are rather cultish from what I understand.

Comment: Moved from {{

rnd}}. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:36, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Please remove references to the Grand Strand, Myrtle Beach, and Conway. This area has always been referred to as the Pee Dee Region of the state and shares little to no cultural similarity to The Lowcountry. Myersfa (talk) 20:04, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The introduction is not from the required neutral point of view. It's a chamber-of-commerce type thing, not suitable for an encyclopedia.

(Egospoon The Tightener (talk) 01:24, 26 July 2013 (UTC))[reply]

I agree. The article in its current form is too heavily sourced by local tourism websites. Particularly regarding the geographic definition, it conspicuously disregards the state's perspective. - ReverendRambo July 6, 2021

I know this article is about the SC Lowcountry, but

I have just modified one external link on South Carolina Lowcountry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150905223711/http://www.lowcountrycog.sc.gov/Pages/default.aspx to http://www.lowcountrycog.sc.gov/Pages/default.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:29, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It seems odd that this article does not have a history section or link to a relevant page. Would appreciate feedback.