Talk:Spamming
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Spamming article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
Refreshing brilliant prose | Kept | |
January 4, 2006 | Featured article review | Demoted |
This level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Dorisdd. Peer reviewers: Dorisdd.
Above undated message substituted from
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Spamming. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090223165604/http://www.malwarecity.com/site/News/browseBlogsByCategory/46/ to http://www.malwarecity.com/site/News/browseBlogsByCategory/46/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:48, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Spamming. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.maawg.org/about/MAAWG20072Q_Metrics_Report.pdf - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160429042633/http://www.scanandtarget.com/blog/2012/07/nba-got-social-game-but-also-social-spam/ to http://www.scanandtarget.com/blog/2012/07/nba-got-social-game-but-also-social-spam/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120511114246/http://www.webuser.co.uk/news/top-stories/492134/toy-story-3-movie-scam-warning to http://www.webuser.co.uk/news/top-stories/492134/toy-story-3-movie-scam-warning
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:43, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
General costs
I would like to delete this entire subsection. It amounts to a complicated explanation of something simple - externalising costs. Also, it's completely free of citations. Arguably it's
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:51, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Why is this page only in its own category Spamming?
Is there a particular reason? Why isn't the page Spamming the category Cyber crime for example? I couldn't find any past discussions about that point in the archives.
- @CodemWiki:, looks like most the cats were removed in this edit back in 2019. Since the editor who removed the material did not use an edit summary, and has subsequently been banned from Wikipedia, I'd say just restore what you think is appropriate. Sam Kuru (talk) 19:19, 30 May 2023 (UTC)]