Talk:Special Report (TV program)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Special Report (TV program) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Questionshould be? Can Trump beat Bernie Sanders?
POV?
Re: my recent revert: the section added seems very POV to me, arguing that Special Report is biased rather than presenting both sides. The section of the article in its current stance marked "Bias" covers much of the same material. If the deleted material is to be returned to the article, I suggest it should go here, and that the wording needs to be changed substantially so as to present a critical view rather than endorse it.
Mort Kondracke
I don't think categorizing him as "right-of-centre" is fair, and smells of bias. He was on Nixon's enemies list and is a Democrat.
Sadistik 09:01, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Mort fancies himself as center-left, but clearly a moderate. I could not characterize him as left or right. It just depends. --
Bias section
The FDR-related accusations are sloppy and don't contain context, and only amount to namecalling. The section does not show what is being referred to, only throwing in a few links to Media Matters and namedropping left-leaning pundits. This should be brought to WP standards. Sadistik 08:41, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Agreed. The current biased section is so messy it'd be best off being completely removed. I can't even follow it. If no one objects, I'll remove it in the coming days. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cs92 (talk • contribs) 13:28, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Removed as per this discussion. Arzel (talk) 17:17, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Hume Retirement
While this is not proposed heading, we have to be flexible with this as a replacement has not been announced. he stated on the
This article really needs to be updated.
Especially the panelist list, looks like it's 15 years old. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZeroXero (talk • contribs) 18:20, 11 July 2018 (UTC)