Talk:Standard tuning

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Music theory This article is within the scope of WikiProject Music theory, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of music theory, theory terminology, music theorists, and musical analysis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Music theoryWikipedia:WikiProject Music theoryTemplate:WikiProject Music theoryMusic theory articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

guitar tunings corrected. op had gotten confused over the guitar in standard notation being written an octave higher. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.146.68.166 (talk) 03:11, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the citations banners, since the content of this article is neither cutting edge science nor contraversial, and IMO banners are rather ugly.

Carel.jonkhout (talk) 19:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I know nobody uses this term, but A9sus4/E describes a guitar standard tuning. —SPESH531Other 02:12, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think there should be a preface that "standard tuning" is standard to Western styles of playing these stringed instruments, which are not all the stringed instruments being used in the world. African and Asian musical genres in particular may have alternative standards for their instruments. 67.66.94.91 (talk) 05:03, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This article seems unnecessary in view of the much more extensive article on

, which covers all of the instruments and tunings given here, and distinguished "standard" and "alternate" tunings.

This article is redundant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.95.43.249 (talk) 23:10, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed.
Weeb Dingle (talk) 19:11, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]