Talk:Star World
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Star World article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
untitled
Does STAR World not air Bold and Beautiful anymore? Someone edited it out and if anything, it should be in the article as a testimonial to its worldwide popularity (which is mentioned in the B&B article itself). Mike H. That's hot 04:57, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
Star World also shows General Hospital, LOST, Kevin Hill, The Oc.
- I'm in Israel, and I don't have any of those except General Hospital...plus, there are shows here not on the list. I'm reluctant to add them, though. MethnorTalk to me!
Clean-Up
This article may require clean-up... especially in the History part. i will try to clean it.
- Article fix, all done. Eve215454 11:16, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:STAR World.jpg
Please go to
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:25, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Schedule Colors
Orange, Gold and Yellow all look very similar. Instead of 3 shades of yellow, a dark blue and/or a purple color would look nice. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.61.57.115 (talk) 06:05, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
History
The line "In the future Cartoon Network will destroy it" is definitely non informative and out of place. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Navalchopra20 (talk • contribs) 11:52, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
In the History section of the document, the following is said about the new STAR World logo - "The new logo was adopted universally on January 1, 2011". This is either a mistake or a statement written to avoid the effort to re-edit it after the said date. I am changing the was to will be and will revert it back on January 1, 2011. —Preceding unsigned comment added by VirajParipatyadar (talk • contribs) 13:40, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
Edit request from Lordbahamutneo, 27 August 2011
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Lordbahamutneo (talk) 04:41, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
- Not done: Please specify the desired change in your request. —C.Fred (talk) 04:49, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
No mention of rebrading effort
Star world has changed its programming and even its bumpers to different colors and styles to atract a different market recently and I think it deserves some mention 118.167.198.200 (talk) 14:34, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
Requested move
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 16:39, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
- Comment can you show Google Books results for the last 10 years please. Thanks. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:44, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
- Google Books?? But I have Google search results. Links are shown as Star World instead of StarWorld.--RA 14:50, 11 July 2014 (UTC)]
- Google Books?? But I have Google search results. Links are shown as Star World instead of StarWorld.--
- Weak Support this title exists in use without capitals as well as with; while "STAR" is an acronym, so STAR is a supported Wikipedia title format. The proposed title would align the article with sibling articles. -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 05:37, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20151003104948/http://www.startv.com/pressroom/pressrelease.jsp?seq=3541 to http://www.startv.com/pressroom/pressrelease.jsp?seq=3541
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers. —