User talk:65.94.171.126

Welcome! Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your host, bas4-montreal02-1096723326.dsl.bell.ca (65.94.171.126), is part of a pool of dynamically allocated addresses and is registered to Bell Canada. It may be shared by multiple users, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you. To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. (Note: Sometimes, due to vandalism, you may be temporarily unable to register). Applying an indefinite block to this IP is not appropriate, unless it is a soft block, because the IP address will later be reallocated to a different, unrelated, and unsuspecting user, thereby impairing access to Wikipedia in an inappropriate fashion. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking. The best approach is to determine the CIDR IP numerical address range and make a higher-level decision to soft-block the entire range. http://www.arin.net/ (for approximately North America) and related sites can help to identify that range. Caution is advised when applying a range block as other Wikipedians, both registered and otherwise, may be affected. In the event of vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports can be sent to its network administrator for investigation. Review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Hello, and

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Intuitive guide to Wikipedia

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but you may want to consider creating an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (65.94.171.126) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! Optakeover^(Talk) 05:10, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That was a nice mistake in RfD "Animals other than Greeks". I know what you meant: which is why I didn't comment there cos one or both of us will be accused of racism. I just was picturing you as a hate-filled racist calling all Greeks past and present animals and low-life. It gave be a big laugh out loud – thank you for it. Si Trew (talk) 12:33, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Humans are animals (Animalia, Cordata, Mammalia, Homo, Sapiens), it was not intended as an insult. I'll add a clarifying note. -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 03:44, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In the

Done, sorry about that.

Portal:Contents/Indexes -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 05:01, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello! I think that it is

I'm telling you on your talk page because unfortunately, IPs cannot be thanked directly. So, thanks! Steel1943 (talk) 16:02, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 03:57, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! 65.94.171.126, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 09:46, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	The redirect barnstar
	Thank you for your participation at RfD discussions. I greatly appreciate your contributions. Keep up the good work! ChampionMan1234 08:53, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply ]

Thanks -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 12:18, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard
  if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Recent changes patrol

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (65.94.171.126) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! LukeSurl ^{t c} 12:40, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creating an account would allow you (once

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Beef Jerky. Since you had some involvement with the Beef Jerky redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 18:45, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Made the changes you wanted, would you please reconsider your Oppose? It is now as you suggested. Hafspajen (talk) 11:05, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Er, which discussion are you referring to? -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 04:12, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Thanks for your work on disambiguation In ictu oculi (talk) 06:39, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 06:48, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing, thanks. -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 06:40, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment here. As you are certainly more skilled than me bout templates, could you test this one (created by the same editor) and check if it works? It appears a blatant nonsense to me, but maybe it makes sense to you. Thanks in advance. --Cavarrone 07:39, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've no idea what that one is for, it doesn't really make any sense, since I lack the context for which it was created. I know exactly what it does, by reading the template coding, but I don't see why anyone would write it. It has some required structuring that makes it less useful in the general case (especially that Mod-Pol construct) and the names of the variables don't make it any clearer as to what this is meant for. I left the usage on the talk page, Template talk:VisualArgument -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 11:57, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, we probably lack the context to understand its sense. Many thanks for the check. --Cavarrone 12:53, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No problemo, and you're welcome. -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 13:44, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for providing input @

Da nada, you're welcome -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 12:01, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't edit war so you can crap on the article with your silly templates if you like. Please go learn what a "primary source" is. The source you'd prefer is a "third-party" or "independent" source, which is not the same thing as primary/secondary/tertiary sourcing. Yes, such sources are great for contentious issues. I can assure you no facts here are contentious and are all easily confirmed by third party sources. Let's leave that hassle for facts that are contended. Please also don't stick a "notability" template on an article without making any effort to see if it is notable. Of course there are third party sources on this camera. A quick Google confirms this. There is absolutely zero chance of it being deleted on those grounds. So what's your point? You've spent more effort edit warring to restore your silly templates than actually checking to see if you are right or not. The article is currently one paragraph. One source for a paragraph seems quite all right to me. It is a stub. If someone wants to expand it, then more sources will be needed. If someone wants to make a contentious claim, higher quality sources will be needed. But until someone wants to make that effort, your templates are just you crapping on someone else's work. I suppose restoring your templates makes you feel all big and righteous. If you think your templates are going to make me jump through your hoops, you're mistaken. -- Colin°^Talk 22:16, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AFC (insufficient number of sources, everything being primary sources, failure to cite notability) so I don't see why you're all hot and bothered about it. Did you want me to nominate it for deletion or something? They are cleanup tags, not deletion tags. If you have such an easy time finding additional stuff, why didn't you add that material? Afterall, that's what you're supposed to do when addressing the concerns cited in the cleanup tags. -- 65.94.169.222 (talk) 08:09, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

I'll respond on the article talk page. You seem to be under some misunderstanding about primary sources vs independent or third-party sources, and about the purpose of sourcing or tagging. This is a wiki. The primary aim of any editor should be to improve articles. Only where they are unable to improve the article themselves, should they drop a template on it asking for help from someone else to improve it. For example, one is unable to get hold of a book or science journal. Since it is trivial to fix the claimed sourcing issues in this article, your purpose in tagging this article is simply to make work for someone else. Which is rude. -- Colin°^Talk 11:07, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

1 California, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

  ArcAngel   (talk) ) 10:22, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the article. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:31, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/RCrB, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

Thank you for your attention.

Hello 65.94.171.126. It has been over six months since you last edited your

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/RCrB}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TKK! bark with me! 19:34, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]