Talk:Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Law This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. U.S. Congress This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is about one (or many) thing(s). United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article should be renamed to attach ",2005" to the end and this phrase turned into a disambig page betweent the 2005 and 2007 bills. Thanks Jon 20:04, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

By the dates it's pretty obvious that the House and Senate used different langauge. But what is not clear is if a conference commitee has been apointed yet or not and also what the differences are. Jon 21:35, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Both the House and Senate passed S. 5; H.R. 3, a similar bill, passed the House, but is still sitting in the Senate. The House's passage of S. 5 occurred after your comment of course. –Pakman044 14:24, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think to get out of stub status this article needs a bit more legislative history. Including the date H 3 was passed and what exactly the differences were between H 3 and S 5. Perhaps a comparision and contrast with the similar 2005 vetoed bill as well. Jon 20:01, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]