Talk:Stomach oil

Birds Low‑importance

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Birds To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Wikify : Ninox boobook ocellata • The Institute for Bird Populations (more)
Other : Add photos to bird articles needing photos (search Flickr for free images

). Add taxonomic authorities to genus articles.

More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Stomach oil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060724172107/http://www.nzes.org.nz/nzje/free_issues/ProNZES24_84.pdf to http://www.nzes.org.nz/nzje/free_issues/ProNZES24_84.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:20, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

The page crop milk covers a similar subject, but on a wider variety of birds. Stomach oil might be termed a particularly oily form of crop milk, and both pages are of limited length, so perhaps merging the two pages would be advantageous to both readers and prospective editors, as both article's scopes are very similar; relating to strategies of lithophilic birds in provisioning their altricial young. Anthropophoca (talk) 03:31, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure merging would be a good idea. Article length is not really a good argument. The deWP article is longer and well referenced and could therefore be used to expand the English article. --Leyo 21:03, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are the two articles too distinct to be merged? Anthropophoca (talk) 05:31, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is a certain overlap in function, but other functions are quite different in my view. --Leyo 22:04, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]