Talk:Stuart Umpleby

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard. If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles Systems B‑class High‑importance High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is within the field of Cybernetics.

Due to possible violation of copyright, see

, sections of this article have been removed for now. Now this article is quite complicated, because most has been improved by others after I started it. Some remarks:

• I started this article between Oct 4 to 10, 2007, in about 8 steps, see here.
• Most have been rewritten Jan 1 to 8, 2008 by User:Umpelby, see here

Now I guess the whole article still needs to be re-checked for possible copyvio's, I have made,

I apologize for all inconvenience I have caused here, see also here. If you would like to assist in improving this article, please let me know. I can use all the help I can get. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 10:41, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I restored most of the article after rewriting only some of it, because it seems to me:

1. Umpleby himself rewrote most of the article in a neutral way, adding several short section (with about 2 to 4 sentences)
2. His contributions have been checked, and this doesn't apply any perminent COI.

-- Mdd (talk) 13:31, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]