Talk:Sudhir Chaudhary (journalist)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Controversies section

The current Controversies section consumes over half of Chaudhry's page. I significantly condensed the section by removing unsourced claims but it has since been restored to the page with the addition of sources. Though the section is adequately sourced, it still remains

WP:UNDUE. Would like feedback from others on whether the section should be trimmed. Meatsgains (talk) 01:59, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Sudhir Chaudhary has been controversial and on news for the controversies which are backed by sources so I think per
WP:WELLKNOWN, the controversies should remain on the article. Thanks, --Aisonajulk (talk) 17:09, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply
]
Sudhir Chaudhary is not a public figure so
WP:NOTNEWS: "not all verifiable events are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia". Meatsgains (talk) 18:24, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply
]
Sudhir Chaudhary is not a public figure and notable for the controversies so how you can consider removing the controversies? BLP policy is applicable here and
WP:BLP1E states "Biographies in these cases can give undue weight to the event and conflict with neutral point of view". The controversies are presented in neutral tone with proper sources. --Aisonajulk (talk) 19:30, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply
]
I'm not considering removing the entire section but currently, it consumes over half of the article, which is
WP:UNDUE. Meatsgains (talk) 01:43, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply
]
It might worth getting a greater community consensus on this dispute at
WP:BLPN. What do you think? Meatsgains (talk) 01:45, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply
]
I have taken this issue to
WP:BLPN. Feel free to respond here. Thanks, Meatsgains (talk) 01:50, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply
]
Thank you. Aisonajulk (talk) 05:43, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I feel it's Chaudhary himself is editing this page, who else need proper source should look here [1] and this [2] please talk back Napstr 13:50, 27 March 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Napstr (talkcontribs)

References

Who written knows as tihadi sudhir ? This is like abuse and this tipe of edit in wikipedia will make wikipedia like a toy game where anyone can come and play as he want Rame1503 (talk) 20:26, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Anoptimistix (talk) 13:44, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Anoptimistix (talk) 13:44, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (It is highly negative defamatory and covers half of article) --Anoptimistix (talk) 13:55, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So it should not be deleted because it is defamatory?? --Auric talk 14:54, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Anoptimistix: - Not quite sure we understand. You're saying the page should not be deleted because it is "highly negative defamatory"? Meatsgains (talk) 16:37, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

- I am here back on this page after nearly an year. At that time I meant to say that negative statements should be avoided on biographical articles.Now I realised even

WP:BLP policy advices to editors that doesnt matter how much the negative fact about a person (especially crime related) is wellsourced it should not be included until court of law passes verdict helding guilty. Hope this clears confusionAnoptimistix (talk) 16:25, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Consensua required for inclusion of contentious statements

Consensus is required for the inclusion of contentious statement. I have removed controversies section as

WP:BLP
says controversies related to crime should not be added until court of law passed conviction. I invite all concerned people for discussion
Anoptimistix (talk) 16:19, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Contraversal content

I think this wikipedia is made to target journalism Rame1503 (talk) 20:40, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 4 September 2020

I want to Add about the childrens of Sri sudhir Chaudhary Sir 132.154.74.6 (talk) 16:34, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We usually don't mention children by name unless they're notable individuals themselves. – Thjarkur (talk) 17:07, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 20 September 2020

My request is for a new controversy to be added, with the following text: "On the night of the 11th of March, a daily news program called DNA (short for Daily News and Analysis) was hosted by Chaudhary. On 7 May, Kerala police booked him under non-bailable sections for spreading communal hate and offending Muslims by showing a chart on types of “jihad” and arrested him. He was later freed.“ Sources: https://indianexpress.com/article/india/kerala-police-books-zee-news-editor-sudhir-chaudhary-6401670/, https://scroll.in/latest/961349/kerala-police-files-fir-against-zee-anchor-sudhir-chaudhary-for-offending-muslims, https://www.firstpost.com/india/kerala-police-files-fir-against-zee-news-editor-sudhir-chaudhary-for-broadcasting-jihad-flowchart-offending-sentiments-of-muslims-8351041.html, https://www.thequint.com/news/india/zee-news-sudhir-chaudhary-booked-by-kerala-police-for-jihad-chart-episode, https://www.huffingtonpost.in/entry/kerala-police-fir-against-sudhir-chaudhary-of-zee-news_in_5eb5249fc5b62d0addad1ea6 176.203.188.216 (talk) 14:30, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Done.  Ganbaruby! (Say hi!) 02:58, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 30 October 2020

My request is that the following sentences concerning Sudhir Chaudhary's appointment at WION be added. "He is also serving as the editor-in-chief of WION (World is One News), which is a part of the Zee Media network of channels.[1]" 131.155.92.42 (talk) 14:55, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. Please provide a reliable source for this information (
MOS:CURRENT and phrase it appropriately. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 17:51, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Why is there a journalist in the title?

That isn't his name haloboy777 (talk) 17:05, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Haloboy777: There is also a Wikipedia article about another person by the same name, and so the (journalist) in the title of this article is to show which Sudhir Chaudhari is meant. The Wikipedia:Disambiguation page Sudhir Chaudhary has a link to each article. --bonadea contributions talk 17:26, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oh okay thanks. haloboy777 (talk) 00:16, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 17 May 2021

Why the heck his age is censored ( He was born on 7 June 1974), please put his age RIGHT NOW ! 2405:201:25:6015:81B:755F:58AA:372C (talk) 13:18, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: as you have not cited reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 13:21, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.google.com/search?q=sudhir+chaudhary+age&rlz=1C1CHBD_enIN874IN874&oq=sudhir+chaudhary+age&aqs=chrome.0.69i59j46i67i433j0i67j46i131i433j0i67l2j0i131i433j46i433l2j46i199i291.1829j1j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 Please put his age atleast, I've even citied reliable source

A list of Google search hits is not a source. --bonadea contributions talk 15:15, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

https://starsunfolded.com/sudhir-chaudhary/ please, approve my request (trust me this source is 100% true)

Semi-protected edit request on 29 July 2021

Change date of birth from 18 June 1974 to 18 June 1972 2409:4050:2E3A:B3C3:0:0:7EC8:820A (talk) 10:50, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 10:55, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:08, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Passive Voice

The article is written in passive voice: "He is currently working at Hindi news channel" as opposed to "He works at Hindi new channel." This should be changed to active voice. 23.129.0.30 (talk) 13:28, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"He is currently working" is not passive voice. It should be changed anyway to get rid of "currently" per the
Manual of Style, but it's already in the active voice. --bonadea contributions talk 13:49, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply
]