Talk:Suillus spraguei

	Suillus spraguei is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
	This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on July 23, 2018.
Article milestones Date Process Result October 25, 2009 Good article nominee Listed January 6, 2011 Featured article candidate Promoted
	A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 31, 2009. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the painted suillus (pictured) is not, in fact, the feeding appendages of an underground monster that wants to eat your face?
Current status: Featured article

	This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Fungi Mid‑importance

• Images are missing alt-text

• It's no longer an FAC requirment. Sasata (talk) 06:05, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• I don't like name casually mentioned without their current status specified. It would appear that Schultze name is nowadays treated under Coltricia perennis

• Added a note about this. Took me a while to remember how to do the code for citation in a footnote! Sasata (talk) 06:05, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Why is "flesh" linked twice?

• Fixed. Sasata (talk) 06:05, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm fairly sure "oblong" cango without a link, and it would probably be simpler to use a synonym for "inaequilateral" (which to me implies quadrilateral spores...)

• Done. Sasata (talk) 06:05, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• • Alternatively, a morphological section in
    leaf shape
    can might be useful.

• Yes, that would work too; making
  ascospore/basidiospore respectable is a future project. Sasata (talk) 06:05, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Done. Sasata (talk) 06:05, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• How would one actually tell spraguei and decipiens apart?

• Added details, and a pic too. Sasata (talk) 06:05, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• The association is poorly characterized, by definition, if the species sometimes associate with members of Pinus subg. Pinus, then saying it "forms ectomycorrhizal relationships with five-needled pine species" (i.e. subg. Strobus) is inaccurate.

• Yeah, I picked up the five-needled pine factoid from somewhere I can't remember, as it was not in the source I had cited. Took it out. Sasata (talk) 06:05, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Put it back in... it is actually five-needle pine, the other Pinus associations are in vitro, but not known to occur naturally. Sasata (talk) 07:56, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• When DO North American boletes typically appear?

• Added a generalization (note no page number given in the source, it's an observation from me scanning several dozen species descriptions throughout the whole book... am I running afoul of
  WP:Synthesis?) Sasata (talk) 06:05, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Circéus (talk) 01:03, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Circeus! I'll work on these later tonight. Sasata (talk) 01:13, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Clear vandalism in first paragraph - re twitch streamers death. I have deleted it — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.31.202.190 (talk) 09:56, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Suillus spraguei. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718024927/http://tai2.ntu.edu.tw/taiwania/pdf/tai.1980.25.1.166.pdf to http://tai2.ntu.edu.tw/taiwania/pdf/tai.1980.25.1.166.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:09, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]