Talk:Sukhwinder Singh

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers / Musicians This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers. This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians. India Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article was last assessed in April 2012.

This article reads like a fan page and needs some serious cleanup. 98.66.146.69 (talk) 22:41, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

True that. The lead paragraph is disgusting. Crotchety Old Man (talk) 13:48, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've edited the first paragraph to focus on facts, and put Singh's first big award before details about the song he won it for. I'd like to get more facts for his bio section. Does anyone have a starting point for obtaining more facts? And is there a playback artistes subdivision of the [Indian cinema task force] project? --Heathquinn (talk) 17:12, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

1. There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
2. It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
3. In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:32, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]