Talk:Suzuki Ignis

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Suzuki Ignis/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following

several discussions in past years

, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

This car is, as far as i know, not available on the european market for more than a year. This information should be added.

Last edited at 14:12, 2 January 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 03:19, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

eeeewwwww==

That has to be the ugliest car I've ever seen!!

Mk. II section confusing

the ugliest car ever made I've tagged this section as difficult to follow, unless the reader has a lot of background on the subject. Are the Holden Cruze and Chevrolet Cruze both examples of the Mk. II model, as the section title implies? I'm also puzzled by the sentence, "The main rivals in the Australian market were the Suzuki Jimny...". If both the Holden Cruze and Jimny are Suzuki-brand vehicles, is it accurate to call them rivals? There's also a contradiction between the text and Infobox here: one says the "Cruze was discontinued in 2006..." but the Infobox production dates given for the Holden Cruze are 2002–2008: which is correct?

Further confusing the reader is the next paragraph, which says Suzuki Europe introduced the second generation of the Ignis in 2003. Are we to understand that the Mk II was introduced as the "Cruze" in 2002 by Holden in Australia and by Chevrolet in Japan (not Suzuki??) and in 2003 by Suzuki in Europe? If so, the article should explicitly say it. If not, rewording is desirable. JGHowes ^talk 23:56, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Definition

Shouldn't it be just a small hatchback rather than a crossover? Crossover to where, specifically - to a

NVO (talk) 08:38, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

References: Direct links for Ignis brochure are not working

The last two links of the references (19 and 20), in detail their second link (the original) are not available and should be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexclai (talk • contribs) 13:17, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Those links are now working again (the Internet Archive was not accessible earlier today). Thanks, OSX (talk • contributions) 09:43, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The original Suzuki links ('the original') are not working. Because they are not available any more. So they have to be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.83.147.143 (talk • contribs) 12:52, 21 April 2011

That's why we have linked the archived versions. Just because the information is no longer being hosted on the Suzuki website does not mean we have to delete the reference, see

Wikipedia:Using the Wayback Machine. OSX (talk • contributions) 13:28, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Suzuki Ignis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Sourcecheck

}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:11, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]