Talk:Taiwan Miracle

This article was nominated for deletion on 5 August 2019. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Economics Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Taiwan High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taiwan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taiwan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TaiwanWikipedia:WikiProject TaiwanTemplate:WikiProject TaiwanTaiwan articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article should be divede in more sections. Yug (talk) 20:52, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't claim the slightest shred of expertise in this area, but the article does sound like it was edited by an overenthusiastic KMT supporter... --chainedwind

There is a statement claiming that Krugman attributes the GDP growth in Taiwan to increase in capital and labor market, rather than increase in efficiency. The citation for this statement is an article by Krugman called "Myth of the Asian Miracle" or something to that effect. However, if you read into the article, there is no mention of Taiwan. The article does talk about Singapore, China, Japan, and East Asia in general terms, but how can such a general article be used to support very particular claim about Taiwan allegedly by Krugman? I suggest removing this citation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.174.140.104 (talk) 17:32, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"But the state was the central organism which coordinated the industrialization process, it created the infrastructures, it attracted foreign investment, it decided the strategic priorities and, when necessary, recurred[clarification needed] to impose its conditions."

This sentence, in special, is laughable. The tone of this article is completely political and anti-encyclopedic.

2804:14C:CC92:AEAE:7D02:22AC:13A8:CB04 (talk) 14:12, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]