Talk:Technology demonstration

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The statement about faked tech demos earning the title "bullshot" I find not so accurate, as it was created in a strip of Penny-Arcade as a joke, and the term is not widely used in the least. 60.240.2.203 11:10, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

-I would probably agree that "bullshot" isn't a widely used term, but I would also postulate that it is a widely-known phenomenon, and that there is no better or more widely used term for it. Up until a few years ago, very many games had screenshots on their boxes that came from the game FMVs. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.94.120.100 (talk) 21:05, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

-I notice that Gmaxwell has been removing the video game related content, and while it's true that video-game-related and other graphical tech demos do not comprise the entirity of tech demos, they do probably comprise one of the largest and most well-known segments of the plethora of types of tech demo. So, perhaps instead of deleting the video-game and graphics-card tech demo content, you could possibly just add other information about other types of tech demos, such as for other applications (ala a new app, operating system, or interface type [see "bumptop"]) which would not only make the article more complete, and everyone more happy, but would extend the article past the current handful of sentences you've edited it down to. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.94.120.100 (talk) 21:15, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Title is inconsistent in style -- either it should be

Term not used in article. 86.179.191.90 (talk) 00:41, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]