Talk:The Art of Losing (American Hi-Fi album)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Good articleThe Art of Losing (American Hi-Fi album) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 8, 2021Good article nomineeListed
WikiProject iconRock music Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fair use rationale for Image:Artoflosing.jpg

fair use
.

Please go to

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

talk) 04:32, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

GA Review

This review is
Talk:The Art of Losing/GA1
. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 12:52, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Good Article
review progress box
WP:CV
()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4.
free or tagged images
()
6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the
Good Article criteria. Criteria marked
are unassessed

I will review this later on for the GAN backlog drive! --K. Peake 12:52, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

This was done by a
talk) 18:09, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply
]
  • The recording date is not sourced; it is only stated in the body they started in March and aimed for completion in April
Changed to 2002 as I couldn't find an end/final recording month.
talk) 18:09, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply
]
Yeepsi Just remove the recording date then, as it is not sourced that recording finished that year (remember, the album came out in 2003). --K. Peake 18:53, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply
]
Removed.
talk) 18:58, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply
]
  • Target Pop punk to Pop-punk
  • "their eponymous debut album (2001)," → "their eponymous debut studio album (2001),"
  • "also in Hollywood." → "in Hollywood of the state." because Burbank is not in the same location as Hollywood
  • "The album has been described" → "It has been described"
  • Target pop punk to Pop-punk
  • "power pop and" → "power pop, and"
  • "and drew comparisons" → "while received comparisons"
  • Critical should be mentioned before commercial reception; change to saying "while reaching number 80..." at the end of the sentence
  • "The album's title track was released to radio" → "Its title track was released to radio as the lead single" with the wikilink
  • Mention that it was the US Alternative Airplay chart
  • Wikilink music videos

Background and production

  • "in February 2001[1] and promoted it" → "in February 2001, and promoted the album" plus [1] should be at the end of the sentence instead before [3] since it backs up the release date and the song being the lead single
  • Regarding the recording of the album, the source itself mentions them aiming to complete by April like you have wrote here; however, can you find anywhere the date recording was actually finished so dates can be added?
I couldn't find an end/final recording month in any of the sources.
talk) 18:09, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Composition

  • Retitle to Music and lyrics
  • "to its final title." → "to the final title." but are you sure this doesn't belong in background or release?
  • Target pop punk to Pop-punk
  • "power pop and rock, and has been compared" → "power pop, and rock, while it was compared"
  • "The opening title-track evokes" → "The opening title track evokes" with the target
  • "being told what to do." → "being told what to do by others." to be specific
  • "of the band's song" → "of American Hi-Fi's song"
  • "trying to retrieve his" → "placing more focus on retrieving his"
  • "recall the works of" → "recalls the works of"
  • "and cribs the work of" → "as well as cribbing the work of"
  • [15][13] should be put in numerical order
  • "recall the music of" → "recalls the music of"
  • Are you sure "channels" is the correct term for this section or should you paraphrase, as I'm not too sure if it's encyclopedic?
  • Target sampled to Sampling (music)

Release

  • Retitle to Release and promotion
  • Wikilink music video
  • "over three days and" → "over a period of three days and"
  • "The video shows the band" → "It shows American Hi-Fi"
  • "some fans approaching" → "some fans previously approaching"
  • Mention that it was released to US radio stations
  • "as the album's lead single" → "as the lead single from The Art of Losing" with the wikilink
  • Target digital downloads to Music download
  • Target CD to Compact disc
  • "and addition to" → "in addition to"
  • "titled "Self Control" that" → "entitled "Self Control" that"
  • "both from the group's debut album" → "both from American Hi-Fi"
  • "bonus tracks while" → "
    MOS:LINK2SECT
  • "It was promoted with" → "The former was promoted with"
  • "club tour throughout February," → "club tour throughout February 2009,"
  • Mention that the performance was the following month
  • "In April and May that year, the group" → "In April and May of that year, American Hi-Fi"
  • "east coast tour[24] but the tour" → "east coast tour,[24] but the tour"
  • "due to family issues." → "due to the lead act's family issues."
  • Mention that the music videos were released in October 2009

Reception

  • IGN should not be italicised
Ah, I was thrown off by the
talk) 18:09, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Track listing

  • See
    MOS:TABLECAPTION

Personnel

Charts

  • Good

References

  • Copyvio score looks pretty good at 24.8%!
  • Top job with the archiving of all these where possible!
  • Wikilink Island Records on ref 5
  • Cite IGN as publisher instead for ref 8
  • Remove or replace ref 10 per
    WP:RSSM
  • Fix
    MOS:QWQ
    issues with ref 14
  • Cite FMQB as work/website instead for ref 17
  • Wikilink The Island Def Jam Music Group on ref 19
  • Ref 32 is a duplicate of ref 35; see my earlier comment for instructions on how to fix this
  • Target Schirmer Trade Books to Wise Music Group on that source

Final comments and verdict

  •  On hold until all of the issues are fixed, but do not feel afraid to reach out if you have any queries! --K. Peake 17:30, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Whoops, sorry, I've done all the changes.
talk) 21:51, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply
]
Yeepsi  Pass now, there were a few further issues that had arisen after my comments being made but I copyedited the fixes in! --K. Peake 06:38, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply
]