Talk:The Horror Show at Extreme Rules

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: July 19 to 25, 2020 (11th)

Why are two edits reverted? You do know that Santa Clara County has banned public gatherings as California is undergoing reopening its economy by stages. So Extreme Rules won’t be happening by July at the latest if California extends its stay at home order beyond June. (See COVID-19 pandemic in California). - 70.49.199.178 (talk) 00:24, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Who changed the article name to "the horror show" this vandalism stuff needs to stop 2601:189:57F:CFB0:A90C:95C0:5C6C:55E (talk) 17:53, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just saw this, but that was me because that is the official name of this year's show, supported by sources from WWE. --JDC808 ♫ 03:14, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fellow JDC808 user constantly reverts my edits pertaining to the use of descriptive names and more specifically "WWE Champion" in place of McIntyre. This is starting to become annoying now. Its basically the same to say "Ziggler interruped McIntyre" instead of "Ziggler interrupted the WWE Champion". Which is right? Zerobrains94 (talk) 15:15, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Constantly reverts my edits". Don't try to make yourself look innocent because you do just the same, except when you do it, you often don't even give a reason. And it's starting to become annoying now? Welcome to my world for the past couple years it's been trying to work with you where multiple things have had to be explained because you just did not understand, but even after trying to explain, you would continue to make those same mistakes (some of it was the most simplest stuff that for whatever reason, you did not get, like the usage of the word "saw" because apparently, the only definition you knew for that word involved your eyes).

On the matter of this subject, both examples are technically right, but it's not a matter of right or wrong, it's a matter of which is better for the prose. Have a read up of this article and this one too. We should strive to have articles that have engaging prose and are of a professional standard (that's the first criteria for Featured Articles). Redundancy and stale language is neither. I've pointed this out to you multiple times as it's something that you really need to work on (just an example, your overuse of "in the end" to wrap up match summaries).

Also, really? Are you going to be that immature? That is another issue in dealing with you. You resort to things like that, picking out the most minuscule things, like a typo, which I explained in my following edit summary that I guess you decided to ignore (like you often do, perhaps the biggest issue in trying to work with you). --JDC808 ♫ 08:49, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

For McIntyre vs. Ziggler, the match type was seen on Facebook, and was leaked. It is TLC. 16ajung (talk) 11:41, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

​Needs to have been mentioned in a secondary source. – Thjarkur (talk) 12:42, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It was on an advert, it wont allow me to upload. Have an E-Mail which i can send on? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 16ajung (talk • contribs) 15:40, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It says Bray Def Braun but that's not true. No-one won. Even on WWE.com, it says no-one won. Bray didn't win. They both fell into water and it ended. I don't know exactly what it should say but maybe "ended in no contest", DanielGamer2207 (talk) 10:04, 20 July 2020 (UTC)DanielGamer2207[reply]

WWE.com does not say "no one won". It says "Moments later, only “The Fiend” Bray Wyatt resurfaced, with no sign of Strowman." It's interpreted that Bray won since Bray is The Fiend and he was the last to be seen. --JDC808 ♫ 13:33, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WWE.com does not list a winner, and some top wrestling journalists could not ascertain a winner,[1][2] even if others considered Wyatt the victor.[3][4] There's a discussion to be had here, especially since WWE.com does list winners of previous cinematic bouts. Dory Funk (talk) 02:15, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The is another error in the results. MVP did not win via forfeit. The match did not take place. WWE.com makes it clear that while MVP claimed the title, he did not "win" it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:152:4680:56D0:242B:1931:6088:A708 (talk) 16:01, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You know what, after thinking it over, maybe Bray did win. Now it says Bray faced Strowman which I don't think is right. This is so confusing. What should it say??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by DanielGamer2207 (talk • contribs) 13:12, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think for now lets just assume Bray Wyatt won simply because he was last to be seen. The results section should feature the winners of each match. I understand that no one can ascertain a true winner in this match, however, having "Bray Wyatt faced Braun Strowman" in the results table doesn't really make sense. Zerobrains94 (talk) 15:21, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just going back to what I previously said, as said in the WWE.com article, Strowman was nowhere to be found and it was Wyatt (as The Fiend) who was the last to be seen, the last standing, or however you want to phrase it. There weren't any rules in terms of a pinfall or submission, it was a fight. For all intents and purposes, Wyatt (albeit as The Fiend) was the last man standing, thus winner by default. Now WWE could spin this as in a way, they (and even Wyatt) treat The Fiend as a completely different person (or rather being). If that ends up being the case (and SmackDown is tonight so we'll see), I would say do it similar to saying it was a no contest, though worded more appropriately to the context of this match. Perhaps, "Bray Wyatt vs. Braun Strowman ended without a decisive winner" and maybe add a note with clarification regarding The Fiend. But, unless WWE does in fact do that, leave it as Wyatt won. --JDC808 ♫ 18:42, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]