Talk:The Laughing Policeman (novel)

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Novels: Crime Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Crime task force. Sweden Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Women writers Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

• Oppose Currently! - There is nothing as yet to split - needs more before this is justified. :: Kevinalewis : ^{(Talk Page)}/_(Desk) 11:26, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Agree - There is no reason to prevent the film from having its own article. Many films based on books are given their own articles. Why can't the same be done here? (IndulgentReader (talk) 00:01, 6 December 2007 (UTC))[reply]

• Agree – the film is different from the novel and should have its own article. --Law Lord (talk) 09:39, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Agree – per IndulgentReader and Law Lord. --Skizzik (talk) 14:28, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Agree – I absolutely agree! Is the concern that there is not enough content in the film portion of this article right now? If so, we can flesh it out nce it has its own home. KConWiki (talk) 13:23, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusion: Result of the discussion is Split. I will do this right away. --Law Lord (talk) 09:46, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]