Talk:The Lifted Veil (novella)

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Novels: 19th century Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by 19th century task force. This article has an incomplete infobox template! - see Novels InfoboxCode or Short Story InfoboxCode for a pattern. Women writers Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

I realize that novels have generally gotten shorter since the Victorian triple-decker days. But there should be some limit, and at 18,000 words The Lifted Veil falls short by almost any reasonable measure. I've changed the cats and classification in the article. It was odd to see this brief work listed with Middlemarch among "Novels by George Eliot". The complete tale of the tape, according to MS Word:

Words: 17717

Characters: 80966

Paragraphs: 125

Sentences: 560

Sentences per paragraph: 5.1

Words per sentence: 31.2

Characters per word: 4.4

Passive sentences: 13%

Flesch reading ease: 59.5

Flesch-Kincaid grade level: 11.0

Casey Abell 14:59, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]