Talk:The Peckham Experiment

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

London Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The participants either paid one shilling or they paid five pence, but it CANNOT be both. This is because a pre-decimal shilling was worth TWELVE pence, and remained so until 1971. HOWEVER, since we have no sources for this claim of payment, and NONE of the articles make plain the amount paid by participants, this absurdity cannot be properly resolved. I see before me two possibilities: either I change it to "one shilling (12d)", remove the payment sentence altogether or adjust the "(5 pence)" to "(5 pence in modern currency). (I do not for a minute think that people were asked to pay 5d back in 1926, not because it wasn't possible, but because it would be such a bizarrely random amount to pay for a fee -- you'd be more likely asked for "sixpence".) I lament that this fact of pre-decimalisation is unknown today, but moreso lament that such ignorance allows creeping errors into Wikipedia undermining everything this alleged encyclopaedia stands for. http://www.bbc.com/news/business-12346083 118.209.238.45 (talk) 09:52, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The ODNB mentions sixpence Simon Grant (talk) 09:43, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a link to this article page from the "See also" section of the Salutogenesis page, as there are clear similarities (see Talk:Salutogenesis)

Would anyone have a problem with adding a link back from See also in this page? Simon Grant (talk) 10:19, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Seems strange that we haven't yet got a page for him. Would anyone like to collaborate on its creation? I have also put this on Talk:Innes Hope Pearse. Simon Grant (talk) 04:31, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to renew the call, after 2½ years, for anyone else interested in creating a page for the highly notable George Scott Williamson. ODNB might be a reasonable starting point. Simon Grant (talk) 09:32, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]