Talk:The Rushdie Affair: The Novel, the Ayatollah, and the West

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. (non-admin closure)  samee  converse  20:06, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests#Requests by 142.160.89.97 for previous opinions about these moves. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 17:26, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• The Rushdie Affair: The Novel, the Ayatollah, and the West → The Rushdie Affair
• In the Path of God: Islam and Political Power → In the Path of God
• God's Rule: Government and Islam → God's Rule
• God's Caliph : Religious Authority in the First Centuries of Islam → God's Caliph
• Future Jihad: Terrorist Strategies Against America → Future Jihad
• Expectation of the Millennium: Shi'ism in History → Expectation of the Millennium
• Maududi and the making of Islamic fundamentalism → Maududi and the Making of Islamic Fundamentalism
• Doomsday Cult: A Study of Conversion, Proselytization, and Maintenance of Faith → Doomsday Cult

– Per

This message has been

refactored. SITH (talk) 14:05, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 08:27, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: I've moved this over from
  technical requests. I will ping the participants shortly. SITH (talk) 14:05, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Pinging participants from technical section: Anthony Appleyard, In ictu oculi, Station1, MarkZusab and Gonnym. I have left a direct link on the nominator's talk page. SITH (talk) 14:09, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose per
  WP:SURPRISE. A reader would not expect a title like "God's Rule", "Doomsday Cult", or "Future Jihad" to be about a specific book. --Ahecht (TALK
  PAGE) 14:21, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Strong procedural oppose These should each be discussed separately, since each has differing issues concerning them. A mass nomination is highly disruptive. -- 70.51.201.106 (talk) 07:02, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong oppose "The Rusdie Affair", that is clearly an atlernate name for the Satanic Verses controversy, as used in the press and on Wikipedia. -- 70.51.201.106 (talk) 07:02, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong oppose "God's Rule" this is clearly prejudicial in focus only on a book about Islam and not any other topics and religions, perhaps amounting to institutional bias if the move is carried out. -- 70.51.201.106 (talk) 07:04, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose "Doomsday Cult",
    WP:NPOVTITLE, unduly demonizes the Moonies, which hasn't committed mass murder/suicide, unlike Jonestown, Aum Shin Rikyo, Order of the Solar Temple, Heaven's Gate. Nor is it the most prominent sect committed to apocalyptism and millennarianism. Leave it as it is, redirecting to doomsday cult. --- 70.51.201.106 (talk) 07:13, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Oppose "Expectation of the Millennium"; that should redirect to Millenarianism -- 70.51.201.106 (talk) 07:15, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose all particularly Expectation of the Millennium, The Rushdie Affair, God's Rule, God's Caliph, Future Jihad, Doomsday Cult; less so In the Path of God, Support Maududi and the Making of Islamic Fundamentalism which is just a CAPS problem. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:01, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a

talk page or in a move review

. No further edits should be made to this section.