Talk:The Savage Nation

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

This page is not a forum for general discussion about The Savage Nation. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about The Savage Nation at the Reference desk.

There have been attempts to recruit editors of specific viewpoints to this article. If you've come here in response to such recruitment, please review the relevant Wikipedia policy on recruitment of editors, as well as the neutral point of view policy. Disputes on Wikipedia are resolved by consensus, not by majority vote.

Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments and look in the archives before commenting.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Conservatism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I have merged in the article regarding Michael's commentator career. Ursasapien (talk) 06:11, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• ...all quotations, must be attributed to a reliable, published source.

Furthermore, there is a sister project for quotations, Wikiquote. It's inappropriate to have more than a few miscellaneous quotations, even if sourced. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 00:42, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article has only a couple of sources. If we cut it down to the cited material we'll have a couple of sentences. Meanwhile, issues related to the show are covered in

Someone take out the lines about Savage pulling down his guests' pants and drop kicking them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.229.210.215 (talk) 10:11, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The link in reference #9 does not access the document it purports to link to. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.92.174.105 (talk) 21:15, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Although I'm not a big fan of the show, I've been listening to bits of it over many years, enough to form a recognizable mosaic of Michael Savage's personal and political views. He promotes a number of conservative ideas, but also some that can only be characterized as "progressive" and "statist", something that a true conservative would never do. He most certainly is a self-promoter, which probably goes with the territory of achieving a measure of success in broadcasting. I suggest removing the descriptive "conservative" in the lead section and just call him a "commentator". Let readers make up their own minds where to place him on the political spectrum. — Quicksilver^{T @} 14:35, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

he's talking a lot about changes in the new year, but i can't quite grasp what's going on. at a minimum, it sounds like he's dropping from 3 hrs a day to 1 or 2, and adding a podcast to make up for the difference. also losing WABC outright, which he considers important for some reason. was this his flagship at some point? he is treating the loss as a way bigger deal than just "one less affiliate", even a large one. 198.147.225.21 (talk) 21:00, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There are two sides to a feud. This section ought to have a quote from Hannity about Savage. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8807:2380:B3:F1C8:5737:79E0:DA03 (talk) 22:23, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]