Talk:The Voyage (roller coaster)

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Amusement Parks: Roller Coasters Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Amusement Parks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Amusement parks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Amusement ParksWikipedia:WikiProject Amusement ParksTemplate:WikiProject Amusement Parksamusement park articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Roller Coasters task force (assessed as Mid-importance). United States: Indiana Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Indiana (assessed as Low-importance).

Just a note, I had listed this as a nomination for Good Article, but that was reverted and I think that makes sense. The article is at Peer Review right now, so I'll correct whatever errors they identify there and then nominate it for Good Article. Valkyria Ann (talk) 17:31, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

inline citations. It seems you are new here, so you may want to take time to contribute to Wikipedia over the next several months before you start nominating articles and exploring related processes such as Peer Review. This article doesn't really have any major contributors, but some you come across may, so keep in mind that some editors could take offense to a nomination if you haven't significantly contributed or fixed major issues before nominating. Also asking someone to review someone else's work will make the review process difficult, since you will be expected to be familiar with the subject and understand why content labeled problematic during the review is in the article to begin with. If you're not sure, that could lead to poor decisions such as the removal of content that shouldn't have been removed. --GoneIn60 (talk) 21:46, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

While you are waiting, it would be good for you to review the following tip pages that assist with cleaning up and improving articles:

• Writing better articles
• Developing an article

Also back on the main

Peer Review page, it would be a good idea to review some of the initial feedback editors are getting to see what kind of common issues are typically found. Then scan this Voyage article applying those same concepts to see if there's some work you can do before it's peer reviewed. --GoneIn60 (talk) 22:06, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Thank you so much for your reply and good advice! I'll read the articles you linked and try to become really familiar with the tips they suggest. And I'll also look at Peer Review and see what corrections I can apply from them to this article. I do hope to become more involved with the Good Article and Featured Article processes since those interest me a lot, but I'll edit more to make sure I know what a good article is supposed to look like. Valkyria Ann (talk) 14:39, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]