Talk:Thiérache campaign
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 13 July 2019
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
ed. put'r there 00:15, 22 July 2019 (UTC)]
It was proposed in this section that Chevauchée of Edward III of 1339 be renamed and moved to Thiérache campaign .
The discussion has been closed, and the result will be found in the closer's comment. Links: current log • target log |
Chevauchée of Edward III of 1346, the campaign name is more common in sources than Chevauchée of Edward III. Dicklyon (talk) 22:37, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
]
- Alternatives – Is this the same as is referred to as the Cambrai campaign? Some books have Cambrai campaign 1338; was that a separate attempt? Others lump these together, it appears. Or is there enough overlap with Siege of Cambrai (1339) that a merge is in order? Ideas? Dicklyon (talk) 15:49, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Dicklyon:, I do not object to Thiérache campaign. The Cambrai campaign proposal is restrictive as the Siege of Cambrai was part of campaign but not its entire objective. @Gog the Mild: is more authoritative on this subject and would be best person to comment. Regards Newm30 (talk) 23:49, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.